Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Darin Gnatt thinks Kenny Moore will replace Smitty at the start of camp


Dpantherman

Recommended Posts

Really think Jarrett gets cut and K.Moore stays. Think about if Jarrett goes down during the regular season. We have Lafell and Gettis to replace him and they could probably do a better job. If Smith goes down, you think they'll start Edwards right away? I don't. Either that or we cut Goodson or Sutton or CJ Wilson (unlikely cause that'll leave only 4 CBs excluding Witherspon because he's just a returner/ST guy) to keep 6 WRs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only reason I would like to see Moore with the ones is that Jarrett and LaFell provide NO speed. Would rather have Moore and Edwards able to stretch the field....with LaFell and Jarrett fighting it out for the #2 spot as the big blocking WR.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kenny is not that fast but runs the hell out of a route. At WF he was a surgeon on the field and even back at Butler HS he showed the smarts to get open. That's what will set KM apart. I see Kenny as more of a possession receiver, IMO. AE, Lafell, Gettis have the speed. Jarrett has the size, no speed and no brain when it comes to football knowledge. I'm sure he is a nice guy but it's his 3rd year? and still hasn't proven himself with the coaching staff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just so we can make some comparisons here are the 40 times for our receivers:

Moore 4.51

Jarrett 4.62

LaFell 4.58

Geddis 4.47

Edwards 4.41

Trent Guy 4.55

Dexter Jackson 4.27

Charly Martin 4.58

Wallace Wright 4.50

Seems to me there are three groups based on speed. Jackson. Edwards are super fast. The next group includes Gettis, Wright and Moore. Then we have Martin, Jarrett, LaFell and Guy.

We have a lot of guys in the 4.5- 4.6 range.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Big opportunity for Nadeau if he gets called up. 
    • I think OL is a pretty low overall concern but every single offseason there should be an attempt to upgrade through the draft. Edge rusher there are no easy answers, IMO. If a truly elite prospect falls to us in the 1st, that is fine. This draft seems to be much more heavy on 3-4 DE's or 4-3 DE's than it is on elite EDGE guys. You just have to keep plugging away every offseason and hope it works out. I don't think it's worth trading a ton of draft capital over at the moment, despite being a crucial roster weakness. Do the best you can and build a better roster and maybe eventually we will be in a position to be making a Parsons level trade.
    • I understand that a capable OC is desirable but I also understand, or think I might, the dynamics with the staff and maybe I’m wrong but I do not see Canales firing his offensive right hand guy without significant pressure from Morgan or Tepper to do so.  So that, in addition to Canales stating pretty definitively, that he was keeping play calling.     I don’t know what you do in that circumstance. It would need to be important enough to you to make it worth firing Canales to get your OC play caller.    To that, if Canales not being good so far at play calling (and we only have the one year in TB to factor with what we have see here), is accepted as a given, it is only fair and honest to consider what an impediment having to construct and administer an offense around Bryce Young’s game would be to an OC. I would say it is a big complication, big surprise there.  You won’t know about Canales 100% until you remove Bryce from the equation and get him a clean slate to create from - without the Bryce restrictions.  And yeah you will likely end up without a top notch high flying offense. But it still *could* be much better than it is now. In the right hands.  So that is potentially what we’re looking at. I suppose we could keep Bryce and bring in a college style coach and design a Bryce rollout offense or something and see if that helped. I am not in favor of that, probably the last thing I would want.  We could do nothing, which I am not in favor of. We could fire Canales and keep Bryce (my least preferred option). We could get rid of both, which I would begrudgingly accept but would lament the interruption of the continuity that a 3rd year would provide.  You could get rid of Bryce and get a couple of new QB prospects in here, vets, drafts, whatever… that would be my choice.  I am afraid I know how it’s gonna go. All I can really say about that is, there has not been a single time in three years that I looked at the upcoming game and felt like we were gonna win because we have Bryce Young playing QB. Because of what he could do with the ball in his hands. Not once. Sure there have been a handful of games that he was part of the reason we won, a couple he was a big part, but not enough times to feel like that is my expectation. At best, it is cross your fingers and hope for good Bryce. 
×
×
  • Create New...