Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Vick's co-defendent shot @ Vick's Bday party

Montsta

By Montsta,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

King Taharqa Newbie

King Taharqa

Posted
Posted

Im late to this thread but Ive noticed a trend. When Vick does something positive or is the news for something good (like wanting to play in our city and for our franchise) the Vick filter comes on and we're STRONGLY discouraged from speaking on him. But the second his name is associated with trouble or something negative its OK to talk about him and some of yall are more than willing to stand on a soap box. Why is that? And then yall get mad at me when I say some of yall hate black quarterbacks more than you love the game of football.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Montsta Rising Star

Montsta

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Yes...We are all animals.... But if you think your dogs life is just as important as your brother, child or a random stranger. There is clearly something wrong with you.

Then there is something clearly wrong with me, because I value my dogs life 1,000,000x more than yours. In fact, if I was commuting to work and saw you trapped in a burning car, the only thought I'd give you is being pissed off that you were causing a traffic jam and making me late.

If you want to melt your GI Joe's with a magnifying glass, that's your perogotive, but saying that dogs are property to be treated however the owner pleases is just wrong and misguided. Dogs have feelings. They know fear. They have basically unconditional love and loyalty.

I've met MANY people in my life that deserved to get the poo beat out of them, myself included. Haven't met too many dogs that got beat up and I said to myself, "Meh, that dog had it coming."

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
Posted

Im late to this thread but Ive noticed a trend. When Vick does something positive or is the news for something good (like wanting to play in our city and for our franchise) the Vick filter comes on and we're STRONGLY discouraged from speaking on him. But the second his name is associated with trouble or something negative its OK to talk about him and some of yall are more than willing to stand on a soap box. Why is that? And then yall get mad at me when I say some of yall hate black quarterbacks more than you love the game of football.

Because you often act like Michael Vick is the only black quarterback in football, and disliking him is equivalent to hating black QBs. That makes about as much sense as saying dislike of Jake Delhomme equals hating white QBs.

I'll break down some of the guys playing right now, but in a separate thread.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Wither Newbie

Wither

Posted
Posted

I just skimmed over this thread but this is what I took away...

Lmao.

All in all, you have to wonder if we're just a very advanced form of cancer.

We're a virus, constantly evolving to keep ourselves alive while draining our host of resources! RAWRR.

Dogs? They don't do anything bad (unless coerced to.. by humans.) It's very depressing that they'd probably still love their owners unconditionally even when treated the way Vick and his cohorts treated theirs.

THAT ONLY PROVES THEY ARE WEAK! WEAAAAK!

Dockery....Where's the speech to these silly people?

I'm off the clock right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • tukafan21
      Scourton isn't signed (& apparently it's a thing)

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      Right, so basically what I said in my first post about this last night. Tepper needs to use that big wallet of his in one of the few ways it can be used in the NFL given the cap.   Give Scourton a bigger signing bonus but not a fully guaranteed deal. Everyone wins in that scenario as if Scourton is smart and hires good money people, he'll take that bigger signing bonus and use it to make more money in the end over the next 4 years than if he just had his fully guaranteed deal and a smaller signing bonus.
    • Basbear
      Panthers Wideout Retreat - TMac Vlog

      By Basbear · Posted

      Im super jelly. 
    • Basbear
      Scourton isn't signed (& apparently it's a thing)

      By Basbear · Posted

      It is all confusing and layered. SB is the cash you get very soon within weeks or in simple terms, its what you get to sign the paper work. Players and agents can agree on contract but what to "wait" to sign......teams don't like that cause you can "Carlos Boozer" yourself. In order to get that ink dry, while keeping the contract the same, portion it as a bonus to "sign" and get the funds with ________ .   * But Ive seen worded contracts that split the SB or a 20% to a later date. The beans counters can fill in the details about why certain dates are better and save the team money.. Theres tricks to the trade and accounting is full of them.    Ugh another big layer, is SB can be used to manipulate cap and players. Ill try to give a example that makes enough sense. Believe it or not having a owner like Tepper is a cheat code for this. He has cash in hand, where as Mark Davis had problem making pay roll and had to move the team to Vegas....... Tepper can give you 100,000,000 SB right now and the team can spread out the cap hit. Another owner doesn't have or want to give the player 100,000,000 in cash, but offered the same guaranteed contract in roster bonuses fully guaranteed over the next few years........ Which one do you want??? Everyone wants the money now, not before another inflation waves hits in 2 years. So it does 'pay" to have a owner like tepper that's able to have real cash on hand, while it also works GREAT for cap help. Heres a good video, if you can stand coked up pat and mask look-a-like AJ    
×
×
  • Create New...