Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Older women and Twilight


DirtyMagic97

Recommended Posts

That's the thing. As women become bored with married life (or bored with pursuing the married life), I think they long for the lust and romance of their youth.

I think that's why Twilight is a hit with women of all ages. It appeals predominantly to young women, but also to women who want to remember what that youthful love was like. Vampires just so happen to be the vehicle Meyer uses to deliver her romance. You're kidding yourself if you think these women are into vampires.

You are right. I guess it's not as creepy as I originally thought. And yea I figured it definitely wasn't the vampire thing that had them hooked.

Maybe I'll read it next. :leaving:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One of my wife's friends is in a "group"... something like "Twilight Moms" or some such... they went to the midnight showing last night... most of these women also do not have kids to take to see it... they're all in their early 30's with really young kids.

Might be my wife...she left the house with a group of her friends and got in line about 7pm for the midnight show and got home around 3 am. When I got home from work today, I asked her how the movie was and she said not good.....when I asked why she said it was not good for me in particular.

Then I started to get a heated lecture about how much such and such loves Bella and men will never understand and if they only had a clue things would be.......zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz! Woke up an hour later with King of Queens reruns on the TV and her no where to be found. I really try hard to be a good husband....I do.... but I can't compete with the Immortal Casinovas of the silver screen

Moral of the story: Never let your wife watch Twilight during that emotional time of the month........or ever.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

its the beetles in 2010. except with everyone wanting to feel younger, its ok for older women to go nuts for that stuff.(i bet some watch the lost boys) i remember when only 14 year girls texted, now grown men with kids of their own send LOLs, eh...

i will say it would have been wrong for millions of older males to go insane over a 17 year girl, the jails would have been overfull. but the ladies did it and no one cared.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

its the beetles in 2010. except with everyone wanting to feel younger, its ok for older women to go nuts for that stuff.(i bet some watch the lost boys) i remember when only 14 year girls texted, now grown men with kids of their own send LOLs, eh...

i will say it would have been wrong for millions of older males to go insane over a 17 year girl, the jails would have been overfull. but the ladies did it and no one cared.

They are socially accepted pedophiles yet I am the one who gets chastised for noticing that Miley Cyrus is beginning to dress a bit more slutty as she nears legal age. Sheesh....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nurse and 2 assistants went to a midnight show. They showed up for work the next day, so whatever.

I guess if it gets people in to reading, like the Hairry Pooper stuff, awesome.

So splane to me how becoming a vampire is "sexy".

Undead, bad hours, soulless and evil. Can't go out during the day. No heartbeat therefore no erections....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't understand Twilight. I've never gotten into it. I think Bella is emo as hell. And I prefer my vampires not to sparkle. Much better vampire books out there, even romance vampire books.

Now my viking vampire Eric from True Blood? Whole nother story. Rawwrrr.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Right, so basically what I said in my first post about this last night. Tepper needs to use that big wallet of his in one of the few ways it can be used in the NFL given the cap.   Give Scourton a bigger signing bonus but not a fully guaranteed deal. Everyone wins in that scenario as if Scourton is smart and hires good money people, he'll take that bigger signing bonus and use it to make more money in the end over the next 4 years than if he just had his fully guaranteed deal and a smaller signing bonus.
    • It is all confusing and layered. SB is the cash you get very soon within weeks or in simple terms, its what you get to sign the paper work. Players and agents can agree on contract but what to "wait" to sign......teams don't like that cause you can "Carlos Boozer" yourself. In order to get that ink dry, while keeping the contract the same, portion it as a bonus to "sign" and get the funds with ________ .   * But Ive seen worded contracts that split the SB or a 20% to a later date. The beans counters can fill in the details about why certain dates are better and save the team money.. Theres tricks to the trade and accounting is full of them.    Ugh another big layer, is SB can be used to manipulate cap and players. Ill try to give a example that makes enough sense. Believe it or not having a owner like Tepper is a cheat code for this. He has cash in hand, where as Mark Davis had problem making pay roll and had to move the team to Vegas....... Tepper can give you 100,000,000 SB right now and the team can spread out the cap hit. Another owner doesn't have or want to give the player 100,000,000 in cash, but offered the same guaranteed contract in roster bonuses fully guaranteed over the next few years........ Which one do you want??? Everyone wants the money now, not before another inflation waves hits in 2 years. So it does 'pay" to have a owner like tepper that's able to have real cash on hand, while it also works GREAT for cap help. Heres a good video, if you can stand coked up pat and mask look-a-like AJ    
×
×
  • Create New...