Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Paranormal Activity 2

Hotsauce

By Hotsauce,
in Huddle Lounge

Recommended Posts

lightsout Grand Master

lightsout

Posted
Posted

I saw the first one and enjoyed it. I'm not the type to scream at everything just because its put out there as a "horror" movie. I for one just wanted to see how it was produced and how into I could get. I wasn't disappointed. I have a thing where, in almost every movie, I think of myself a little. How would I react to that? What would I do? What would I be expecting. That's what got me. Obviously, the quick stuff got to me. But it exceeded the expectations I had before going into the theater.

I will probably see the second based on the fact that I like the first. I just pray they don't try and go overboard here. I don't want to end up hating the first and second one because the second one blows that hard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
lightsout Grand Master

lightsout

Posted
Posted

If anybody is interested, I just went to IMDB...the cast for the sequel...is well, interesting, to say the least. I wonder how they're going to work this movie based on the cast listing and the trailer. But it does seem like the sequel is going to sort of pick up where the 1st left off (at least, after the messages that were at the end that left you saying wtf?)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CharlotteBeer.com Newbie

CharlotteBeer.com

Posted
Posted

I really enjoyed the first one. It was slow-moving, so if you're the type that likes your horror with a cheap scare every five seconds, it's not your kind of movie.

That being said, I'm not excited for the sequel. The Blair Witch sequel was absolutely horrible.

It's ironic because both Paranormal Activity and Blair Witch were made with very little funds. After bringing in tons of money, however, the producers decided to try to capitalize by creating sequels that were far lesser movies (I'm just assuming that will be the case with Paranormal Activity; I could be wrong).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • TD alt
      Panthers HC Dave Canales hints at adding more weapons for QB Bryce Young

      By TD alt · Posted

      Not really. It all depends upon perspective. You can draft quality OTs high every year. They have one of the lowest bust rates by position. DTs, less so, but good ones still come along at a regular clip. With WRs, it's simply best to draft one in the first round if you want a legit play maker. Moreover, WR is going to set you back more than OT or DT at really all statuses, meaning JAG receivers are going to make more than JAG OTs and DTs, and elite receivers will make substantially more than elite OTs or DTs. I would also argue that it's much harder to find a franchise level OT or DT that can have an altering impact upon the game. So, if you don't believe they can, you may as well wait for day 2 or 3. That's why sticking to your board is probably the wisest thing to do. If you're not committed that the value is there, then what are you doing? Lastly, I don't think you should necessarily draft in a vacuum, but you must look at each team from year to year. People want to make them the same, but they're different. You have to start over every year and identify where the strengths and weaknesses are. You can't say, "Well we drafted [so and so] last year or two years ago, so we'll just draft this this year." That's not realistic and it can be highly counterproductive, especially in light of the reason that you should be trying to use FA to set up the draft.
    • Joe Bear
      2025 Draft Re-Grades (Or, One Idiot Doubles Down)

      By Joe Bear · Posted

      If you read through his stuff, he's had a raging hate-boner for the Carolina Panthers the likes of which would make many long-tenured Huddlers blush. Every win was "yeah but" and every loss was "see I told you so".
    • Joe Bear
      2025 Draft Re-Grades (Or, One Idiot Doubles Down)

      By Joe Bear · Posted

      Let me preface this by saying I've read WalterFootball on and off for 20 years. That's an indictment on my decision-making, and it's more than fair to be questioned.  However, the days of reading what's become weak ragebait have drawn to a close after he re-graded the 2025 NFL Draft's first round. He gave T-Mac a C on draft night. What was his re-grade for the NFL Offensive Rookie of the Year?  Carolina Panthers: Tetairoa McMillan, WR, Arizona – C Grade One-Year Grade: C+ Grade Tetairoa McMillan won Offensive Rookie of the Year, but only by default after Emeka Egbuka vanished in the second half of the season. McMillan was good, and was certainly limited by Bryce Young’s mediocrity, but there are still concerns about his work ethic and passion for football. If he doesn’t progress in the coming years, we’ll know why. Original Write-up: Wow, our Panthers source did not pan out for once. Jalon Walker was heavy chalk to go here, but the Panthers decided to draft a No. 1 receiver instead. While this fills a need, I’m concerned with Tetairoa McMillan’s work ethic, which is something you never want to hear from a first-round prospect, especially one who is chosen in the top 10. Bryce Young needs this, and McMillan is talented, but will he give 100 percent at the next level? Also, what about the defense, which was the worst in the NFL last year? https://walterfootball.com/nfldraftgrades2025.php
×
×
  • Create New...