Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Would you put Vaughn on the PS so far???


Zod

Recommended Posts

collecting talented RBs, no one does it better. skipper must have influence. i thought have the panthers have the best RBs, as a group. goodsen and sutton could be #2, looking through my panthers shades. im starting to think, this maybe the best group in nfl history :eek::eek:

yes for me.

in the little ive seen, vaughn deserves a PS check. i love to see how he feels today, dealing with pain is #1 my RB handbook.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd say yes, as he looked decent last night. With the amount of running plays we call, I think we have to maintain a healthy pipeline of ball carriers.

Would it be to much to carry 4 RBs and possibly 2 FBs on the 53 man roster to start the regular season, with Vaughn on the PS for good measure? Ideally we could instead stash Jackson on the 5 man ps, but I doubt he would clear waivers.

(and Fiametta's strong performance was also nice to see; more plays called for the FB spot might help keep double trouble fresh later in the season)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd say yes, as he looked decent last night. With the amount of running plays we call, I think we have to maintain a healthy pipeline of ball carriers.

Would it be to much to carry 4 RBs and possibly 2 FBs on the 53 man roster to start the regular season, with Vaughn on the PS for good measure? Ideally we could instead stash Jackson on the 5 man ps, but I doubt he would clear waivers.

(and Fiametta's strong performance was also nice to see; more plays called for the FB spot might help keep double trouble fresh later in the season)

I don't think we'd keep Vaughan over Goodson if we were to keep four backs.

Personally, even though I like Jackson, I feel we should keep four backs and then Fiammetta. Sutton has shown he can fill in at fullback occasionally (as has Dante Rosario).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Only his second year in the league, I believe this makes him eligible, no?

I have been touting this guy here, since we met his family and watched him at Woffard...it was very subjective not objective...but he looked good. Then we watched him last night, and I agree with you - he's certainly PS material, and might get some back up possibilities. He wants on this team, and told me so!

All that said, he got us some good first downs and played some ST's too I think...gotta re-watch the game tonight!

VOTE VAUGHN!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...