Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Fox proved he can start a rookie WR, can he do the same at the QB position?


Mr ocho nueve

Recommended Posts

Just curious to see what everyone thinks on the situation. Fox proved that he can start a rookie WR in LaFell, but do you think if Matt Moore bombs out he can swallow his pride and give Clausen the start? I think he is looking for a reason to bench Moore, even though he has come out and said he is the man, we all know if another QB comes in and fox is impressed, Moore could see the door.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just curious to see what everyone thinks on the situation. Fox proved that he can start a rookie WR in LaFell, but do you think if Matt Moore bombs out he can swallow his pride and give Clausen the start? I think he is looking for a reason to bench Moore, even though he has come out and said he is the man, we all know if another QB comes in and fox is impressed, Moore could see the door.

OMG NO YOU DIDN'T!!!!

Panther55 is going to be all over this...best delete thread QUICK!!! :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, LaFell ain't starting yet.

That said, the knock on Fox being afraid to start rookies is bogus. Fox's flaw is once he commits to starters going into seasons (whether it be vets or rookies) he appears to be unwilling to make a change if needed in season to his depth chart. Injury seems to be the only means to get Foxy to change his depth chart once a season begins in terms of starters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Posts

    • Woa there, Cinderella. Just because the shoe might fit doesn't mean that you need to put it on and run around inside the store. Wild how you open by saying "almost nobody wants to lose," and then immediately launch into why winning under Wilks was bad, why the culture didn't actually improve, and why the team should've leaned harder into failure to get better draft position... That's not "reality." It's just more performative fatalism where every sign of progress gets reframed as a mirage, and every win is a setback unless it comes with a Lombardi. These are Olympics-level mental gymnastics designed to justify a perspective where the Panthers only deserve credit after success but are poo on for trying to build towards it. You call it "ridiculous" to link this mindset with the endless Bryce hate (yours included, of course), but let's be honest: you have made that your brand as much as you like to claim that the Panthers have made being losing theirs. Every time progress gets mentioned, it's like clockwork... here comes the obligatory reminder that Bryce "isn't the guy" and that any progress he made didn't count because <insert moving goalpost here>. I have to tell you... that doesn't sound very "adult."
    • I feel all lower paced sports will struggle going forward w/ eyeballs.  I mean, America's pasttime might do a good job of ripping off the youth/parents with forever baseball and 58 little league world series each year you can play in......but MLB is a tough watch vs other sports.  Golf the same.  We are grooming humans to need constant action thanks to the magically internet.  Hard to watch a game where the "action" and excitement might be a moment once an hour. 
    • I will say this, this was very barstool like from a league that prides itself on being classical.
×
×
  • Create New...