Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

I know how to time travel.....


Awesomeness!!

Recommended Posts

Look up at the night sky, hell look at the Sun. YOu're not seeing the sun as it is right now, you're seeing it as it ws 8 or so mins ago. The same for stars in the sky. You're really seeing the star (or how it looked) maybe millions of years ago, depending on the star, because it takes the light so long to rach us. I'm sure you already knew that. Anyway, if you could travel faster than light, say, 100 million times faster than light, and you got in your rocketship, and blasted off, and you're rocket ship was on course to land whereever the Earth was..say 100 years ago, you would travel to the Earth 100 years in the fast. Einstein said that time and space were connected, and since all Space exist right now, all time must also exist right now. Which means, Next week, has already happened.....or, is happening right now we just haven't lived it yet. But that also means the past must be happening right now....if you could just get to it..........

Now all we need is a rocketship that can go 100 million times faster than light..:auto:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've don't think a macroscopic object like a typical space probe or a rocketship could make the trip, but a microscopic object with very...very little mass could. I've always pictured something like that..'riding' on a light beam, but somehow making the light go faster than light by giving it a boost of some sorts. Keep in mind, light does have mass. It pusses on objects when it hits something. Photons have mass, so a microscopic probe of some sorts could ride on a light beam..its possible..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Too many assumptions of variables falling into place. I do think it's possible, but not on the terms we have been taught.

I think something outside the rules has to be able to interject to "break" all the rules.

We can only project and assume the outcomes are time travelled has happened.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nope. On our terms we understand one level. There are levels above ours that we can't comprehend. This fits perfectly into time travel.

To flat out quantify it for our bicameral orbs. We would truly need to meet someone from the future to get it.

My youngest brought this up the other day. Dad, I don't think we would really want to time travel. Why I asked? Because we get older but really because we are better off in the present.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

wagering.jpg

I don't think it would be physically possible to travel anywhere close to the speed of light, much less FTL. Since energy particles (light) have a wave/particle duality and since matter is merely energy condensed and vibrating and a specific frequency, I have a hunch that accelerating to the speed of light would first cause you to become infinitely massive at the atomic level until your atomic structure would essentially "break" into subatomic particles. Remember, there is no such thing as solid. Things are essentially only held together by magnetic bonds and solid is a result of perception. That kind of speed would only be possible on this level, where something can have both the properties of a particle and a wave; it occupies space but has no mass.

One way might be to manipulate gravity "around" an object by somehow manipulating and accelerating the particles around the object, essentially "pushing" the object on a wave of particles that is less massive in the front and more massive in the rear where they have been accelerated. We don't have this technology, yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I had started typing my post hours ago and didn’t finish it and just came back to finish it, posted it, then saw yours and saw we were pretty much saying the same thing - even the games that stick out to us most.  I don’t think a lot of people remember that SF playoff game, but I felt like I had just got mugged in broad daylight.  I remember them calling Mitchell for unnecessary roughness, and then I remember watching Boldin take a super late cheap shot, dead in front of the ref and then showing him watching the whole thing in replay…  the refs let them have a fuging field day and didn’t do jack poo, but if we so much as breathed the wrong way it was fuging 15 yards.  Each team playing under two completely different sets of rules.  poo hurt.  I was enraged.  I’ve never went back to watch either that game or SB50 and never will.  fuging robbery.
    • I’ve said it a million times since, but it’s impossible to keep them from affecting the game.  In SB50, they literally took the game from us, and they did it early.  Cotchery’s no-catch?  The miraculous amount of times we converted for a first down only to have it suddenly called back make it a 3rd down and 15+ against the best defense in the league that specialized in rushing the passer and man coverage on the back end?  And you do that enough times, you kill the morale and confidence of the team you’re doing it against.  It’s telling the one team “you can do whatever with impunity” and the other “you can’t do whatever they’re allowed to do.”  It changes the aggression level.  It essentially neuters one team and allows the other to do whatever the fug they want.  Imagine you call the police for help and they get there and tell you to sit still while the other party beats the poo out of you and you can’t defend yourself.  That’s what the officials do.  There is no way to avoid them affecting the game.  And more often than not, it’s the most subjective calls they use to do so.  Even in SB50…  you saw the Broncos commit more egregious penalties than anything we did, and barely any of it was called.  Their OL was holding all fuging game and the refs did nothing.  We already had our work cut out for us against two future HOF edge rushers and the refs played to their advantage with that.  From what I remember, both Oher and Remmers were called for holding at various times and their hands were in the INSIDE of the defender.  It was garbage, but all by design. Also, if there is any video of it anywhere, go look at what the refs did against us back in 2013 against SF.  The fix was in there too.  They stepped in early and often and ensured we knew we were not allowed to play with the same aggression or intensity SF was.  It was disgusting as well. at this point, I hope Vince McMahon, errr, I mean Goodell just finally scripts us to win it, because this poo is not won via competition or off merit.
    • You can go back to the New York Knicks somehow getting Patrick Ewing.  I saw a story where they place the New York Knick card in the freezer right before the drawing.  It was simple.  Show everyone the cards are undetectable to the human eye.  All they had to do was grab the coldest card. IMO ever since Goodell took over the NFL it has been fishy.  Patriots winning the SB after 9/11, New Orleans after Katrina and Peyton Manning's going away gift against us. The terrible calls during that game were blatantly one sided.  New England should have been stripped of their first 3 SB when they were caught spying on the other team in their SB wins.  I think the evidence against the Patriots was so damning Goodell felt it could ruin football and they brushed it under the table.   In the 2004 SB, How did we go from practically no yards in the first Quarter to setting a record in the 3rd Qtr.  Dan Henning changes the game plan.  IMO probably the greatest half time adjustment of all time.  
×
×
  • Create New...