Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Playoffs under Fox: The trend continues


TbTeRRoR

Recommended Posts

I know some of these things have been stated before, but I'm going to go into more detail.

2003:

Dallas:Reg season- they beat us down. Playoffs We returned the favor

Rams: Reg season- didnt play playoffs TIGHT GAME

Eagles: Reg season- Beat us soundly Playoffs: We return the favor

Patriots: Reg season didnt play Playoffs TIGHT GAME

2004 Nothing

2005

Bears: Reg season beat us down Playoffs We returned the favor

Giants: Reg Seaon Beat us down Playoffs We dominated

Seattle: Reg Season:didn't play Playoffs We got dominated

2006:Nothing

2007:Nothing

2008

Cardinals Reg Season: We Win tight Playoffs We got Dominated

Following this trend if you beat us in the reg season your in trouble

if we didnt play you it will be a tight game or we will get blown away

if we beat you your gonna kill us. Its been true to form so far. Weird

Maybe Fox and co arn't good at making adjustments at the half or on the go, but when they've been beaten they've made adjustments in the long run. Saying that maybe when they win they don't see the need to improve or think that maybe just maybe the other team will make adjustments like the Cards gameplanning Fitz agianst our soft zone.

Now I dont post a whole lot so take it easy on me. Least theres not a ton of negativity or nut huggery in this post........ so far.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So if history is any indication, come playoff time we'll beat whoever beat us in the regular season.

Yet by your very argument the same is true of the teams we face. They beat us in the postseason if we beat them in the regular season. It's almost as if having played the team the first time allows the losing team to make the necessary adjustments to win the match the second time.

Of course, Arizona is the only team we've beat and then later faced in the postseason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Some of you act like one can't learn from experience over time. Just because you may not know what you're doing in 2018 doesn't mean that you don't know what you're doing in 2025. Frankly, you grow from experience, and success and excellence gives first-time applicants the hand probably 99.999% of the time.
    • It's an interesting topic of conversation as sports evolves. I think ultimately it would lead to a number of small market franchises folding though. Especially in the NBA where there are so many bad teams that have been bad for years and years in some cases already. But as it stands I think athlete pay draft or no draft aside has reached a point where we can and should realistically ask should they make that much compared to the average person. Now college athletes is a different conversation but even that reaches a breaking point. But we could go down the rabbit hole on this even further into overall entertainment and talk about actors making absurd sums too. In the end I think in sports the powers that be won't allow these changes to even be considered because it opens the door for so many other variables. But who knows how long sports like football will realistically be around after people like us pass on. We're only just now learning about things like CTE which the league and the sport in general will only be able to run away from for so long. As far as the NBA goes my understanding is viewership has been steadily going down for a number of reasons but one crucial aspect is key players missing so many games. The NBA has to figure that out regardless. Especially when considering fans who pay to see these athletes compete in person. But hey I guess let's just try to appreciate what we've got while it still exists in this form eh?
    • I can't see a world where the money goes down, but maybe your lottery odds are now your contract numbers you can offer.  Thunder? You can offer Flagg 4 years, 20 million.  Hornets? You can offer Flagg 4 years, 80 million.  Some form of a system where the money is still there, but so is the freedom of choice (on top of bad teams getting *some* competitive advantage to signing them). 
×
×
  • Create New...