Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2011 Movie lineup may be the biggest in years!


o803oVaDeR

Recommended Posts

Thor, Captain America: The First Avenger, Green Lantern, The Green Hornet, X-Men: First Class, Transformers 3, Super 8, The Hangover 2, Cars 2, Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows part 2, Kung Fu Panda 2, Scream 4, Underworld 4, Sherlock Holmes 2, Mission Imposable 4, and Pirates of the Caribbean 4

I probably missed a few!

I think this is the largest list of must sees, I have ever seen. I know at least 10 of these I will see in theaters, and with my kids I will have at include at least 2 more that I will take them to see. The others I will wait for DVD, but it could be a huge year for Hollywood. I just hope they dont F' up at least half of these potentially great movies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

not an original film in the bunch. I f*cking hate hollywood.

*sigh*

Pretty sure that is not the entire list of movies if it is then they will have to be in the theater all year. There will be a handful of excellent originals as there are every year.

As far as the list goes.....Cars 2, Hangover 2 are all that peak my interest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pretty sure that is not the entire list of movies if it is then they will have to be in the theater all year. There will be a handful of excellent originals as there are every year.

As far as the list goes.....Cars 2, Hangover 2 are all that peak my interest.

oh, i understand. it just sucks that all hollywood wants to put money into and all people want to see is the same shiat that they've been watching.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I will be seeing Thor, Captain America, X-men (even though I hated the last one. Kevin Bacon is playing the lead bad guy, so it will be worth seeing), Transformers 3 (did not like 2 that much, but hoping the writers strike had a lot to do with how bad it was), Super 8 (Love J.J. Abrams), Hangover 2, Harry Potter, Scream 4 (I know, this has big potential to suck, but I really do like the first 3), Underworld 4, and Sherlock Holmes 2 (I have not seen the first one yet. It is one of those movies that seems to always slip past me, but I want to see it. I have heard nothing but great things about it.)

I am sure the kids will want to see Cars 2 and Kung Fu Panda 2 (I did not really like the first one, but they did)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't think Dave touches the defense. That might be a mark against him but definitely a huge red flag for evero. He refuses to run anything other than soft zone and when you don't get pressure that's an awful scheme
    • You don't have to convince me. I think not picking up the option should absolutely be firmly on the table but I just do not see Tepper and Morgan doing that for previously stated reasons. Therefore I'm not going to bother entertaining the notion. Just hoping we actually get real viable competition. If that doesn't happen at the minimum then my perception of that is complete and utter professional malpractice.
    • It was absolutely a catch, and I can’t believe how many folks were stating, before the NFL’s apology, that the overturn was the right call.  The ultimate question in this case is this: can a player complete a catch with only one hand? Of course, we all know the answer to that question, and it is an emphatic “Yes.” T-Mac maintained complete control with one hand (believe it was the right) while the other came off when the ball hit the ground. The ball was in the same position in the one hand (watch T-Mac’s fingers in relation to the NFL shield on the ball) after touching the ground as it was when it first went to the ground. Going back to the question above, if one hand can establish control, then there was no need for the other to stay on the ball, so long as the ball doesn’t move in that one hand that stays on it   It blew my mind that they overturned this in the first place. This should not be a “We got it wrong on the replay because there wasn’t clear and convincing evidence.” This should have been, “That was absolutely a catch.”
×
×
  • Create New...