Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Jeff Davidson, NOT Fox or Hurney, Needs to Be Fired


Carolina Crazy V2

Recommended Posts

I'm sure they call 2 plays in the huddle as always, 1 run and 1 pass. It's up to Moore to read the defense and call the correct play at the line. Davidson didn't make him throw to Smitty with a party of NYG's around & in front of him.

Moore failed.

Is this a guess? This look like a guess...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm sure they call 2 plays in the huddle as always, 1 run and 1 pass. It's up to Moore to read the defense and call the correct play at the line. Davidson didn't make him throw to Smitty with a party of NYG's around & in front of him.

Moore failed.

I'm not so sure about that. Jake was starting for a couple years and didn't start getting 2-play sets until the 2005 season.

Regardless, the Colts were down a couple scores going into the 4th quarter also. Peyton Manning ending up throwing 57 passes in a loss- don't see the Colts fans calling for their OC's head....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Davidson threw the game away. My problem is his formations sucked. The whole game we was in a bunch setup. If they wasn't bunched up he put 1 wr in and 2 TEs. tried to pass it.

After he spread the offense out and begun to get yards, he put them in a bunch setup again! And we got smashed...Davidson is the problem!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Henning's issues are no where near to what Davidson's are.

Henning was too conservative and played the game tight to the chest. He was never really willing to throw the ball no matter what the situation. When he did it was a bubble screen or a 3 WR set on 3rd and 18 and two WR's would run 5 yard outs and one would run a 3 yard hitch.

Davidson freaks the f**k out if we are down at all in the second half and starts throwing the ball every single down. He never establishes a run game if we are losing at all. If the run game is going great and we get down by any margin in the second half, Davidson will abandon the run and start throwing like crazy.

Oh, you mean like the NFC Divisional game against St. Louis? Conservative like that? Or did you mean like the Super Bowl? Or maybe the playoff win against the Giants and Bears following the 2005 season? Conservative like those? Please...

The common thread between Davidson and Henning aside from their propensity to call identical game plans- John Fox. But you would honestly have us believe John Fox just paces the sidelines working the gum, arms folded across chest not saying a freakin' word?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not so sure about that. Jake was starting for a couple years and didn't start getting 2-play sets until the 2005 season.

Regardless, the Colts were down a couple scores going into the 4th quarter also. Peyton Manning ending up throwing 57 passes in a loss- don't see the Colts fans calling for their OC's head....

Bringing up Jake won't exactly end this conversation. lol

I don't know if what you type is true (might be another guess, huh?) but Jake did change plays at the line before 2005. Whether he called them in the huddle himself or the OC did, he did make changes at the line.

Which brings me back to it is the QB and not the OC that failed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I questioned getting Davidson from Cleveland to begin with. We have to face the fact that the Panthers RARELY play well when they are behind on the scoreboard. Foxball is good as long as we are leading and protecting the ball, in my opinion Fox's style of football forces the guys to play perfect in order to win, theres no leeway for mistakes.

Of the coaches we have on staff, Meeks is the only one id have a problem with if they got rid of any of them.

As for the comments ive read already bashing Matt Moore, yeah he made some lousy throws into dbl and triple coverage, but lay some blame on that poor performance from the O-line. Honestly, with that performance by the line it really wouldnt matter who was under center today. Also give props to the Giants D-line, they brought pressure all day, we couldnt handle it.

Overall, it was a hard game to watch, but we had to know the Giants were gonna be pumped for this game considering how we thrashed them at the last game of their old stadium. I totally agree that was a piss-poorly called game by Davidson. I hope they can shore up all the holes, the guys have alot of work to do this week.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is it a guess that they didn't have 2 plays called? That Moore might've had a problem with reading the defense?

Sounds like another guess. the problems I seen was bad playcalling, offensive line breakdown, communication trouble between the qb and the wrs, dropped balls...those are not guesses

I have a educated guess and someone tell me if im wrong... Its easier to read a defense when they are spread out!?!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is 100% FOX. Good riddance.

This.

YOu idiots actually think Jeff calls all of the offensive plays? They look damn near similar to the play-calling Fox&Henning was calling.

Fox's stubby little fingers are dipped in nearly everything the offense runs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Davidson is just calling games the way Fox wants.

Moore will be a scapegoat. Just like Jake was to a large degree degree last year. They opt away from the run and go pass heavy on a team built to run.. The outcome is only a surprise to the Carolina coaches. That is why Richardson told Fox he could leave and is letting him go.

Carolina is no different than last year. Good team. Probably a playoff team based on the roster. HORRIBLE coaching. One that doesn't use the right playcalling based on his roster or even manage the depth chart correctly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Right...I think they've done really well. No one's going to bat 1000% but they've addressed areas of need and there's no comparison to the overall talent of the team now than when DC and then Morgan got the reigns. This whole season is about seeing how much of a step up can Bryce and this team make. If Bryce can't and last year is as good as it gets for him then at least we have a talented roster for the next guy. I think we're going to be good this season 
    • I said could, not would. I recognize he has potential based on past performance. Compared to what KP has done, Howell has more potential and the physical traits to make noise. KP has small hands and a weak arm. Not something you want in even your backup QB.  I've been hammering since last off-season before we re-signed Dalton, improve the room. Other than getting younger, I don't see how anyone can say we legitimately improved the room or even tried. We might as well have signed Josh Rosen.  Dalton is still on the roster for now. That's 3 QBs unless we trade or cut him. He's still Bryce's mentor after all. Do you believe we are going to draft someone with potential and give them a legitimate opportunity to develop from the practice squad? Are we going to carry 3 QBs on the active roster? 4 for a developmental rookie? Are we going to potentially cut KP if we draft a rookie and he's outperformed? Doubtful. Cutting Dalton(if we can't trade him) and KP would be 8m in wasted cap space.  I chose Howell as an example because he showed promise in his only full season as a starter. You could plug in another name with the physical traits and potential and what i said would still apply. KP showed almost nothing and was benched. I genuinely don't care if it’s rookie pick as long as there is the potential to develop into a future NFL QB.  As much as I can't stand him, Bellichek was always developing a number 2 QB even with the GOAT as his starter. The wisdom of that was evident when Cassell came in when Brady was hurt week 1 and went 11-5 and almost made the wildcard, which 11-5 gets you almost any other year. I give credit where it's due though. Cassel and Jimmy G both came into the league as developmental QBs, potential QB1s, and went on to have careers.  You never know if you never try. KP feels like a punt in addressing the most important position on the field. Bryce has never played 2 full games of franchise QB level football back to back.  If Bryce progresses, are you ready to offer a 280m 5 year extension based off a one hit wonder year? If Bryce regresses and we need a QB in 27, are we going to trade a fortune away again to trade up to 1 to get one? Are you ready to do the past 3 years all over again?  To me, it's not about Kenny Pickett. It's about the move itself. It was a feeble attempt to improve the QB room. We better hope Bryce succeeds, because if he doesn't, we literally have no backup plan right now.   
    • IOL that early isn’t good value at all. We have a LT who might not ever be good again and a RT that might retire soon. T seems deep early in this draft, so I’d go there in the 1st. 
×
×
  • Create New...