Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

If we end up 0-5 going into the bye week, we NEED to fire/cut SOMEBODY!


AceMan

Recommended Posts

...at the very least as a statement. I doubt it will happen, but it should. Davidson, Fox, Jarrett...your pick. From Davidson, there are two things I saw that pissed me off immensely

1.) We stopped running screens after the 1st one worked well

2.) We kept running the same pass pattern with Gettis when Clausen was struggling to hit Gettis with it. The defense almost picked it off on that same pattern (Thanks to Gettis for breaking it up)

I actually would choose Davidson as the most likely to get the pink slip. If Steve Smith is out for an extended amount of time, I can see us keeping Jarrett around. Also, Fox probably won't get cut no matter what he does.

A statement needs to be made though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we fire Fox or a coordinator, then we'll just promote up another scrub from our dysfunctional system. Just ride it out and try to get some actual talent from outside the org once the season is over.

Seriously, my nightmare is Fox getting canned and Davidson, Meeks or Skipper becoming our HC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we fire Fox or a coordinator, then we'll just promote up another scrub from our dysfunctional system. Just ride it out and try to get some actual talent from outside the org once the season is over.

Seriously, my nightmare is Fox getting canned and Davidson, Meeks or Skipper becoming our HC.

That is literally what will happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...