Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Its obvious to anyone with a clue, the Panthers draft with their first pick...

Zod

By Zod,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Fiz Newbie

Fiz

Posted
Posted

I have 0 doubt that one will be done. Fear not my friend.

A post I had last week on why I thought there would be no lockout.

Bruce I believe you've reached your opinion by not understanding a single word of what's going on with the labor negotiations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MadHatter Rookie

MadHatter

Posted
Posted

I think it firmly relies on who the next coach will be.

If he is an offensive minded coach who believes in the passing game, a WR might not be out of the question.

I could realistically wee DT, CB, or maybe even OL if a stud was there.....I am just not that sold on Gross as an elite LT.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
hsfolk Collaborator

hsfolk

Posted
Posted

I think it firmly relies on who the next coach will be.

If he is an offensive minded coach who believes in the passing game, a WR might not be out of the question.

I could realistically wee DT, CB, or maybe even OL if a stud was there.....I am just not that sold on Gross as an elite LT.

A new coach might want someone else to be his QB of the future. He might not like Clausen that much

Link to comment
Share on other sites
thefuzz Mentor

thefuzz

Posted
Posted

Foxy drank his own cool aid in thinking that his scheme made DT's better than they were. And while that may be true with Rucker on one side of you and Jenkins and Peppers on the other....this is not actually the case.

If you are going to play conservative D, not blitz a ton, and use the ground game to try to win you football games....a stout D line is a must.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MadHatter Rookie

MadHatter

Posted
Posted

A new coach might want someone else to be his QB of the future. He might not like Clausen that much

Doubtful.....Jimmy has shown all of the tools to be a very good QB.

I doubt that a new coach would make a move from him in the first year...even if he had questions as to whether he was "his" guy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Fiz Newbie

Fiz

Posted
Posted

Fiz, I believe you reached your opinion by not understanding a single word of my post.

like how could you seriously write this

Secondly, The players want more of the "pie" and so do the owners, so instead of the owners giving that. They want to expand the pie. The players will resist at first, however money talks. And with the expanded rosters and a rookie pay scale, veterans needs will be met.

and pretend to have any idea what's going on

Link to comment
Share on other sites
PantherBrew Newbie

PantherBrew

Posted
Posted

like how could you seriously write this

and pretend to have any idea what's going on

Well, I believe that is how it is going to play out. I don't really care, if you agree. But if you think there is going to be a lockout, you haven't been paying attention.

I do appreciate your message board argument style. Which entails, pick one subjective part of a post and then say that I can't prove it and then call me wrong. Bravo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Fiz Newbie

Fiz

Posted
Posted

actually i shouldn't have even responded because not a single part of that post could be disproven.

"they're all smart, they just want a larger pie (wtf does this mean), they're being cordial, DAMN YOU UNIONS" is all just a bunch of trite meaningless horseshit.

show me how much you don't care if I agree by responding again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
rayzor Grand Master

rayzor

Posted
Posted

if there is a rookie cap then an early pick wouldn't be a problem to trade away. no way i would use an early pick on DT next year. i would either go WR or CB.

w should go after the best FA DTs available. i would much rather have a couple vets brought in than try to develop them. if we have money, we need to use it there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
PantherBrew Newbie

PantherBrew

Posted
Posted

actually i shouldn't have even responded because not a single part of that post could be disproven.

"they're all smart, they just want a larger pie (wtf does this mean), they're being cordial, DAMN YOU UNIONS" is all just a bunch of trite meaningless horseshit.

show me how much you don't care if I agree by responding again.

hahaha, you're right I dont care.

you-da-man-mel.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Kevin Greene Newbie

Kevin Greene

Posted
Posted

...best DT of the draft. If that means trading down from the #1 pick to the #7 or 8 pick and picking up a second rounder in the process... so be it.

If there's a rookie salary cap in place next draft I could see us trading down. Otherwise it's tough getting someone to take on #1 pick money and give up a 2nd.

That being said, I think we'll win more games than 2 or 3 teams this year.

Maybe Bills, Browns and Lions. :confused:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • cranky
      2027: Sharing my thoughts on the cap without a lotta research

      By cranky · Posted

      Rico walking is no big deal. I'll take a healthy 2024 Hubbard over Rico any time and losing Mays is, again, no a big deal.  Young is signed for what, $35M for the next two years? Say he wants $50M but the FO doesn't. If they put the franchise tag on him, that would be around $55? So basically they are getting Young for the next 3 years for an average of $30M per year. Putting the franchise tag on him wouldn't be my first choice but it gives them an option that wouldn't be locking him into a long term, $50M contract. I'm not suggestion they do that. Just that the option will be there should they get to that point. Hunt is on a 5 year deal which is done in 28 so he either restructures or is gone anyway. Moton will be 35 by then and will either be gone or have diminished playing time. Neither of those players has anything to do with getting Young a contract. The O line is way overpaid anyway. Hopefully by the time they are gone, Freeling and Hecht will be developed and Ickey will be healthy. Young was benched his second year and only got his job back because Dalton was injured. Not sure how you can call that entitled. And I would NOT say putting a rookie QB on a team with no receivers, tight ends or O lineman and then being put with a coach who never wanted you and is fired mid season, is a definition of luck. As far as competition, no team is going to bring in competition for a QB picked first overall - especially given the capital that was given up to get him.  
    • bythenbrs
      OFFICIAL 2026 Undrafted Free Agent Thread

      By bythenbrs · Posted

      With apologies to Lady Cowboy fan, any day we can screw over the Cowboys is a GOOD day…
    • Daeavorn
      The Carolina Huddle

      By Daeavorn · Posted

      Been here since 2014ish. Good times. Its a shame Zod wont sell, it wouldnt take that much effort to get this place back into shape.
×
×
  • Create New...