Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Offense is Terrible


Squirrel

Recommended Posts

Clausen was terrible. He improvised good but besides that he did nothing good yesterday. Poor time management batted balls at the line and Missing receivers. Dont believe the stats as they dont show the true performance. Should had have atleast 1 maybe 2 INTS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It all starts and ends with the big uglies. Those batted passes almost had me chuck my beer at the tv though...

u cant blame that on the OL even though his pockets were pretty ridiculous. The guy needs to move around if possible in said pocket and throw in a fuking passing lane.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was not a great performance but then again he was in one of the loudest places in the NFL. The fact is we almost won the game. If we can build on that next we maybe we can get a win. I just hope he continues to improve.

While it true that the place gets loud it wasnt that loud for most of the game. When it did get loud he had trouble getting the plays off in time. But it still doesnt excuse the bad throws and throwing into the defensive line.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey, there was one incredibly creative play yesterday. Putting Stewie on the far outside and having him run down the sidelines to catch a touchdown pass was the first bit of actual creativity I have seen out of the team so far.

And let's face it, we're so danged vanilla in our play calling that Nawlins didn't even bother to cover him.

One new play, one touchdown. See what happens when someone uses their head and doesn't just pull another page from the 1989 Cleveland Browns playbook?

Overall, we were just lackluster. Couple of good catches from Gettis, one great run and a handful of good ones from DWill, and a heads up play by Jeff King.

Beyond that, Claussen played better but is still quite underwhelming, the O-line was unremarkable (which could be argued is actually an improvement), my 88-year old grandma could have converted more third downs than the team did, and Dwayne Jarrett looked like a total dumbass on the famous "Where did the ball go?" play.

And now Smitty will be gone for a few weeks, which might not be a big deal. Claussen couldn't find Smitty in a phone booth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey, there was one incredibly creative play yesterday. Putting Stewie on the far outside and having him run down the sidelines to catch a touchdown pass was the first bit of actual creativity I have seen out of the team so far.

And let's face it, we're so danged vanilla in our play calling that Nawlins didn't even bother to cover him.

One new play, one touchdown. See what happens when someone uses their head and doesn't just pull another page from the 1989 Cleveland Browns playbook?

I think that was just blown coverage, but whatever, sometimes you take what is given. But I hope Davidson noticed what happened on our next possession. The run game opened up a little bit, just because of one long pass. With this Oline you have to pass the ball to open up the run, So I really hope somebody besides a fan at home noticed this...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think everyone says Mike Evans because of size, but really they have different strengths and play styles.  Tmac is better on intermediate routes and not nearly as good at contested catches. 
    • At this point, it is criminal to go into the 2026 training camp/OTA's with XL penciled in as a #2 WR. The team must upgrade, either through free agency or the draft. If he cannot give 100% effort on significantly less snaps as a #4-6 WR(players like Tremayne have done that consistently) then I don't think you have a player worth rostering beyond the trade deadline. Offensively, we eventually have to upgrade to an NFL starting caliber C. It's been almost the length of time from Gross to Ikey since Kalil retired and we have below average to terrible C play. Love Mays as a BC-esque utility backup but he will never be an above average long term starting C.  The TE room is one of the worst in the NFL but it's a low usage position in this offense, so the investments are likely to be small, if any. I would never expect to see an elite TE in a Dave Canales offense. 100% agree on OL depth. We actually aren't bad there but BC will be gone, Mays is a UFA, Corbett is a UFA and Zavala has been both injured and bad. We have to bolster that depth again or resign guys like Mays and Corbett to keep that depth somewhat stable.
    • Bingo. The dude is a baller no doubt and I'd love to have him in a vacuum but like you said he's gonna fetch a haul so the only teams it really makes sense for are teams with an overall good roster who they feel an edge rusher like Crosby would out them over the top in terms of competing for SBs. I'd be looking st teams like the Pats, Bucs, Ravens, Seahawks, etc. It wouldn't be shocking to see him moved. He may be more valuable to a rebuilding team in the form of the draft assets he'd fetch than he is on the field. He should still have several more good years in the tank at 28 but by the time the Raiders can reasonably expect to rebuild he's gonna be on the decline.
×
×
  • Create New...