Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Da Bears


ladypanther

Recommended Posts

For my 2000th post I decided to start a thread. Let's move on.

The Bears looked terrible last night. My guess is Cutler will play....but he has got to be rattled. Might be Matt Moore like, post concusion.

Pep will be fired up, but could lose interest if he is on the field too much. So the question is.....can Clawsome make some progress, and can Foxy and Davidson come up with a decent game plan to put some points on the board?

This game looks more promising that it did a couple of weeks ago.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think Cutler will play. I see it as our first W of the season

I didn't think Moore would play right after his concussion but he did. Bears had no thoughts of having him evaluated in NY, so he is a possibility. If he does play, the first time the Panthers pressure him, PTSD sets in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we can compete with the Saints, we can beat the Bears. It definitely helps that Cutler is hurt, and it would be great if Otah was back by this week (very doubtful though).

It's going to be a close game, and it ultimately comes down to turnovers and our running game

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol wut?  Stats dont matter now?  Got it
    • So.... you're admitting he's never going to be the type of QB who can drag his team to victories on a consistent basis? Because in today's NFL, the teams that are constant contenders have QB's who can put up those kind of games will their team to wins when needed. If Bryce was anything near as amazing last year as the Bryce defenders try to insinuate he was, we'd either have won more games or his stats would have been better, if not both. Yes, he showed significant improvement over the last 2 months of the season.  Yes, he had a few clutch  moments/throws/drives in that span too. BUT... It's also very much a true statement that on the whole, he was still AT BEST an average QB during that time period.   And for a QB who was touted as being a PG who can get wins without elite talent around him because of how he sees the game, that's just not good enough, sorry. And none of that is to say he can't do that this year, especially after we gave him a weapon like T-Mac and hopefully an improved XL and Coker.  But stop trying to say he was this amazing QB to end the year who has proven he can (and should) be considered a long term solution as a franchise QB, as it's just not true.
    • In what way is that remotely the same thing as I'm saying here? First things first, comparing QB's to any other position is just asinine to begin with.   Second, you're trying to imply the exact opposite of what I'm saying here, so it just doesn't make sense. I'm saying if you remove the players that teams haven't committed to as their long term QB solutions yet, Bryce is the last player ranked in this set of rankings, that's all.  But sure, go ahead and try to make some weird convoluted equivalent for my love of T-Mac (who btw, you'd probably only need to take away 12-15 WRs for me to rank T-Mac #1 in a dynasty format, just sayin, lol)
×
×
  • Create New...