Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

HDMI Cable


DirtyMagic97

Recommended Posts

So, about a year ago I purchased an HDMI cable to use for my PS3. I purchased a $130 Monster Cable. I'd like to get another one for my Xbox that is in another room from the PS3. After I spent a pretty substantial amount of money on the first one, I read online that there really is no difference in quality if you purchase an expensive one or a cheaper one. Does anyone know if this is the case?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

HDMI is digital. It carries nothing but zeroes and ones. It could be made of a wire hanger and have the same performance.

(Okay, not really, but you get my point. All high speed hdmi cables are manufactured to the same specifications.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In a perfect world the idea that all cables are created equal is in fact true.

The reality though is that you get varying degrees of materials and craftsmanship. With an el-cheapo cable you may get a connector that's poorly soldered and clamped on the cable. Or insulation thats susseptible to interference from other sources. Or wires inside the cable that are misaligned or not wound to spec.

You might never notice a difference in the 5 dollar no-name cable and the 100 dollar one. Then again you might wonder why you seem to have worse motion blur than your neighbor seems to.

For my money, after spending what I did on the TV and the Blu-ray player the extra cash for a nice cable seemed insignificant. But I did buy a 30 dollar one for the cable box because its just not capable of the throughput that some of my other sources are.

just my .02

I think a nice balance between these concepts is the cables at monoprice.com. The cables are of good construction, and the videophiles I've interacted with over the years seem to love them. And they're inexpensive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In a perfect world the idea that all cables are created equal is in fact true.

The reality though is that you get varying degrees of materials and craftsmanship. With an el-cheapo cable you may get a connector that's poorly soldered and clamped on the cable. Or insulation thats susseptible to interference from other sources. Or wires inside the cable that are misaligned or not wound to spec.

You might never notice a difference in the 5 dollar no-name cable and the 100 dollar one. Then again you might wonder why you seem to have worse motion blur than your neighbor seems to.

For my money, after spending what I did on the TV and the Blu-ray player the extra cash for a nice cable seemed insignificant. But I did buy a 30 dollar one for the cable box because its just not capable of the throughput that some of my other sources are.

just my .02

from my understanding this is true of analog, not of digital. digital works or it doesn't. construction quality is certainly a concern but it isn't enough of a concern to spend 20x the money on it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You're assuming just as well.   Morgan and Canales were hired 3 days apart.  I believe it was partially due to their connections in Seattle.  i believe Tepper wanted some familiarity with his GM and HC.  It is so easy to sit back and arm-chair QB over draft picks.  You don't know what the philosophy was going into the 2024 draft.  I believe Canales and Morgan were drafting for the future.  XL and Brooks point to that philosophy. Name me one GM that is 100% on draft picks.  Just one.  You're not going to find one.    I think year one picks weren't for what can you do for me now but Potential.   XL hasn't lived up to the hype of a 1st rounder.  I think we all can agree on that. However, there still is hope he comes around.  What I believe they saw in him was his speed after the catch.  He needs to get more consistent but when he gets the ball you kind of hold your breath just a second because if he gets free, he's gone.  The Brooks pick was a signing for the future, and no one could have guessed he would re-injure the same ACL.  This makes the pick look bad but Dallas was ready to draft him later that same round.  IMO we'll have to see what happens next season before we can call this a bust. Wallace has improved each season and for a third rounder has done well.  Sanders has shown flashes and considering the pick in the 4th round it wasn't a bad pick.  His sophomore season IMO was a little bit more productive.  Smith-Wade has been a good addition and has played well.  For a 5th round pick to get as much playing time as he has.  Most picks below round 3 should take a couple of years to get up to speed.  He's been a decent player.  Crumedy, no comment We turned Barrett into Jackson.  This was an amazing move and basically got a starting CB for a 7th round pick.  Pretty shrewd if you ask me. Coker, maybe the best Free Agent signing of the 2024 draft class. So, in short, you can't say that the draft was a bust.  It isn't a home run but all but one are still on the team and outside of Brooks have made contributions to wins.  2025 draft class has been much better with almost every pick making contributions this season.  Now take Fitterer's two years and compare them to Morgan and tell me that they have the same philosophy. 
    • He hasn’t led crap, he’s on loaded teams and a piece of the puzzle. And he’s he has improved drastically but it took the ultimate QB whispers in Shanahan and KOC. You put him on this Panther team and he’s back to normal Darnold 
    • Slavin and Jarvis week to week. Florida cheap shots took out our two best players.  I’d start KK so he can beat the brakes off someone.  
×
×
  • Create New...