Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Tom Brady on Ravens: "They talk a lot for one win in nine years"


The Saltman

Recommended Posts

New England's 23-20 comeback overtime victory over the Ravens wasn't enough to get to Ravens linebacker Terrell Suggs to stop talking.

After the loss, Suggs said that Tom Brady "made some plays . . . But like I said, he just better hope he don't see us again."

"Well, he had his chance so maybe if he gets another chance he can try to back those words up," Brady said in comments transcribed by the Boston Globe. "We play those guys a lot and they've only beat us once . . . they talk a lot for only beating us once in nine years."

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/10/18/brady-on-suggs-they-talk-a-lot-for-one-win-in-nine-years/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hate the Patriots, but Id loved it when Brady was trying to get the refs to flag Suggs on roughing the passer, and Suggs got in his face, and instead of backing down, he started jawing back, and led the team down the field to tie it up. I still hate Brady and the Pats, but I thought was pretty damn cool.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

but, he's white! Thought you had to be black to be a great quarterback

You've never heard me say that. Im not built like alot of dudes here. Giving props to a white QB thats great at what he does doesnt make me feel like a sellout to my race. It doesnt make me feel like "black trash". Saying a white QB could do something better than a black QB doesnt bruise my ego. I'm not gonna tell the Panthers, if they bring in a white QB I wont cheer for them anymore. Hell Ive been cheering and supporting the all white QB squads we've had for years. You've never seen me say every QB that plays for the Panthers should be black. You've never seen me try and make a white guy seem stupid for suggesting a QB thats white. I dont make it my life's mission seeing them fail, or telling teenage white kids they'll never be QBs, play kicker instead. There's a social context for all of that fear and insecurity folks have when it comes to a young black man being potrayed as their "savior" that blacks just dont have when it comes to white QBs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

how did that terrelle pryor guy do on sat? oh wrong thread :lol:

Better than Jimmy Clausen last Sunday. Terrelle will be starting next time his team plays, will Jimmy? I suppose Jimmy never lost at Notre Dame. :rolleyes: And when he did, did people instantly use that as justification why he shouldnt even be given an opportunity to play QB? Only a black QB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...