Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Name the person in this interview.


pstall

Recommended Posts

"I really believe ______ just flat-out got outcoached," "Former Player" said. "He got outcoached. And I said it on the pre-game show that ____ does not change. He knows what he's gonna do. He lives by the blitz. He dies by the blitz."

"Former Player" continued, saying _____'s biggest weakness is that he does not make adjustments at halftime.

"Whatever they [the Cardinals] did, they made adjustments, and ____ did not make adjustments," "Former Player" said. "He really don't make adjustments. I know he went in at halftime and said 'Listen guys, we just gotta make more plays.' And normally we would go in and we would draw up the plays that was beating us, but we want to know how can we beat these guys? What adjustments can we make on the sidelines? And that's ______'s Achilles heel that I've seen over the past years that I've played for him. He's not a good halftime adjustments coach and it showed."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I remember this... still a "little" bit of an Eagles fan. It was Jim Johnson. I think it was Trotter who was upset.

Philly is a tough town to play for. They spend less than the Redskins & Cowboys, yet Andy Reid is threaten with his job ever year. I'm not for jumping sh*t every time it gets a little rocky --- Dallas has proven that, that insane approach doesn't work. At the same time, taking your job seriously and benching players who aren't performing is a NICE start. Lucas, Jake... just to name a few. Open some eyes for a change.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...