Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

New NFL hit rules explained (sort of)


Tutto

Recommended Posts

ooooooooooooooh

I get it now.

They aren't telling them to stop hitting each other hard, just to stop hitting each other hard in the neck/head area. you can still blow some dude up by nailing him in the chest, just not above it.

some of those look a little borderline though. The merriweather one was blatant, but the martin one the robinson one, and the harrison ones didn't do it for me.

also it seems like Receivers can just lower their heads and draw a penalty for things like this now. seems a bit silly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ooooooooooooooh

I get it now.

They aren't telling them to stop hitting each other hard, just to stop hitting each other hard in the neck/head area. you can still blow some dude up by nailing him in the chest, just not above it.

some of those look a little borderline though. The merriweather one was blatant, but the martin one the robinson one, and the harrison ones didn't do it for me.

also it seems like Receivers can just lower their heads and draw a penalty for things like this now. seems a bit silly.

Yeah I agree. If a defender targets a receivers chest, but the receiver lowers his head, that would be a penatly although that isn't the defenders fault.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it was the schlereth piece where one of the guys said the natural reaction for a receiver getting hit is to tuck in, so a hit to the chest or shoulder turns into the head because a receiver tucks his head down while getting hit. Football is such a split second sport that this will be almost impossible to enforce. If you ask me they need to make a committee that has like 8 current NFL players to judge what's a legit hit and what's all bad. Make it comprised of two qb's, two wr's, two lb's, and two cb's. That way you get perspective from various sides of the ball. At least then it's real NFL guys and not suits determining what is bullshit and what isn't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I can see Cooper being a target. Wouldn’t be bent out of shape but obviously not a preference if we’re talking position picked — but I’m just looking for impact. And man, this draft class is an odd bunch in our range. Has these really talented hybrid Slot/Safeties, McDonald (but I think I liked Tyleik more the other year), Faulk (huge work in progress), Saddiq (TE in R1?), and some interesting but wildly different profiling OTs. Our biggest needs: ILB, 3-4 DE, S/Slot (à la Branch), OT, WR, and TE The WRs here would be a notable impact add.  I personally don’t have a position I am pining for. I see Thieneman, Cooper, McDonald, and McNeil-Warren as my faves right now but it could change.  Iheanachor is a sleeper at OT over Proctor, Miller and others. A big eye-of-the-beholder year. It would take a major reach for me to be ticked with the pick bc there’s just too big a range of players, positions and types this draft. Unpopular: Honestly, I kind of love the idea of just trading up for Styles if he slips to 8/9. It’s not a year where capital is going to be lofty.     
    • I have wanted to do that since I first looked at the draft order and the crop of players.  A lot of it is, just not that impressed with the selection we are likely to have at 19. And then when I learned how good some of these ILBs are I never bought that we could sit at 51 and get one. So trading back helps us have a chance to move up for one of those guys. 
    • I would pass, dude is 30 and would require using a draft pick to get.  Maybe if we were in season and having a better year than expected and see the need for a CB, but right now no. 
×
×
  • Create New...