Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Should coaches be "friends"?


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

Hypothetical question: How would you feel about coaches being off-field social friends with players that they coach?

Would this be a good thing for team chemistry, or is it better for coaches and players to have an arms-length, strictly professional relationship in the interest of objectivity?

Note: Knowing how some here think, I fully expect a response suggesting "Friend" Jennifer Aniston be hired as a coach. If you want picks of Jennifer, click here: Lovely Ladies Forum

(nimrods) :mad:

(now watch someone suggest Courtney Cox or Lisa Kudrow)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think there is a much tighter community among coaches than the general working public, for obvious reasons.

edit - not enough coffee. I thought you meant coaching staff being friends with each other.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was an enlisted Marine, then later an army reserve officer, so I've seen it from both sides. You can't work with people everyday in high stress situations and not become familiar and even friendly with each other to some degree. But there has to be a line that you do not cross to maintain the hierarchy of authority. There's a reason commanding officers are discouraged from fraternizing too much with their troops. I would think something similar would apply to the player/coach relationship dynamic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it's why most coaches don't last very long in the NFL. They get tight with the first group that buys into their shpiel, but then when those players lose a step (see: Minter, Rucker, Foster, etc) you are still sticking with them and losing the respect of the younger players who should be in their place. You believe in them because they believed in you, and you are unable to separate loyalty from performance, or even potential.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it's why most coaches don't last very long in the NFL. They get tight with the first group that buys into their shpiel, but then when those players lose a step (see: Minter, Rucker, Foster, etc) you are still sticking with them and losing the respect of the younger players who should be in their place. You believe in them because they believed in you, and you are unable to separate loyalty from performance, or even potential.

Would you see that as less of a problem for longer tenured coaches, or more of one?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Malcom Spence is the best player remaining, hope he’s there.
    • The era that you played in, and, more importantly, who you played with actually matters. Honestly, that's why these issues will be debated forever, as it's just difficult to say that this person or that person is better when you're discussing the passage of time. As for me, after Rice, Moss and maybe Megatron and T.O., there's probably a dozen or so guys that can be argued about to the cows come home. Personally, I'm not putting Fitz, Harrison, Johnson, Evans, or especially D-Hop, Jefferson, Chase or Hill definitely in front of Smitty (and Colston ain't even in the discussion). Context and all that stuff actually matters. Things like the triple crown matter. 
    • Some of those guys? Yeah honestly you can.  I would 100% take Steve Smith over Larry Fitzgerald, Harrison, even Mike Evans. He is 100% a better player than those guys in his prime. If you look at the numbers Smith is historically under targeted in comparison to his contemporaries. He was only targeted 150 times or more only once in his career. Fitzgerald for example was targeted well above that 9 different seasons. Had Smith played with Peyton, Brady, Greatest Show on Turf, or even with Warner in Arizona he would broken records. His 2008 season was ridiculous accumulating 1400 yards in 13 games on less than 80 receptions. All time he also lost a season due to injury in 04, barely played WR as a rookie. Got robbed of 1k season with Clausen. Thats easily another 1800yds minimum that should have been tacked on to his #s. The only guys I’d say for certain are better than Smith are Rice, Moss, TO, Megatron, Julio Jones, Antonio Brown.
×
×
  • Create New...