Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

DJ's latest top 50


 Share

Recommended Posts

On 4/2/2025 at 8:19 PM, Lurk21 said:

I see

 

Ward

Sanders

Hunter

Carter

Graham 

Jeanty 

As definitely  going before our pick. Then you add in teams with young qbs that need protection... So add in at least 1 Oline(maybe 2)...  I think it will come down to Walker n Warren or trade back and Nick or Golden.  Funny he has  Warren  top 10 but he gets so much hate.  Dude is athletic  and has the dawg mindset Dan looking for.  

 

on another thread in the draft section, I mentioned (today) that FanDuel had the over/under on Sanders between 7.5 and 8.5--they think he is going at #8---I hope so--a trade back would be ideal.   I say watch the Colts--they guessed the Giants.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, TD alt said:

I realize that it's the lying season, and it's all a chess game, but I've been hearing that both the Browns and the Giants might forego using their top picks on a QB to take Carter and Hunter. If that happens, both QBs could slide to appreciably later in the round. Moreover, the Raiders just extended Geno.

That is why i LOVE this time of year--trying to predict what teams will do---

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

on another thread in the draft section, I mentioned (today) that FanDuel had the over/under on Sanders between 7.5 and 8.5--they think he is going at #8---I hope so--a trade back would be ideal.   I say watch the Colts--they guessed the Giants.

Very much possible! Just that Qbs always get hyped up the closer to the draft.  Somebody definitely  would go get him if he starts sliding and  I'd assume 7 and 8 are definitely trade up spots if he gets past 3.  Pats probably don't want to get out of the top oline in a trade back, So I'd count them out. Jags seem bent on Tet and Graham, so don't see them moving too far back. Oakland will most likely take Jeanty. Jets... definitely  a wildcard with so many holes...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, TD alt said:

I realize that it's the lying season, and it's all a chess game, but I've been hearing that both the Browns and the Giants might forego using their top picks on a QB to take Carter and Hunter. If that happens, both QBs could slide to appreciably later in the round. Moreover, the Raiders just extended Geno.

Could work for us in a trade back. Saints are going QB at 9 I think 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Really? Wow. Sorry. Got my timeline messed up. I remember someone claiming to be Graham’s mom on the old Charlotte.com board so I guess it was a long time ago that he was here. I guess I thought he was after Kasay. 
    • Nick Scott has gotten his share of Huddle hate, but I came across this SI article by Zach Roberts when I was researching recently released Quandre Diggs, speculated to be a better option  (https://lastwordonsports.com/nfl/2025/11/07/breaking-titans-cut-former-three-time-pro-bowler-quandre-diggs-4-destinations-ranked/3/), but getting back to Nick Scott... Now to be fair, the observation on Scott was before the Packers game, but the stats couldn't have changed that much, and may have gotten better.   "At some point during virtually every Carolina Panthers game, you have probably found yourself grumbling about Nick Scott. The much-maligned safety has seemingly been out of position a lot or has failed to make a play. The eye test has often let him down. "But that's why stats are so helpful. Sometimes, the eye test, especially for fans, is unreliable. On occasion, advanced metrics help make sense of things and lend more clarity. In the case of Scott, they make him look like a much better safety than any of us would've guessed. "In coverage, Scott has given up just 15 yards and an average of five yards per catch. That's the lowest among safeties, leading superstars like Julian Love, Talanoa Hafunga, Quandre Diggs, Kerby Joseph, Kyle Hamilton, and Minkah Fitzpatrick. "In FI%, the safety leads all his counterparts once again at 40%. Brian Branch, Camren Kinchens, and Xavier McKinney are some notable names he leads. He's been pretty excellent in pass coverage, which is crucial for the Panthers." For those wondering, "FI" means forced incompletions. Now I'm way past trying to figure out why X links aren't embedding for me like they used to, but here you go: https://x.com/dacornerman/status/1981363757608513632?t=rx_5iLjp8_y5huNcg_y1nA&s=19   Suffice it to say that Scott may not be as bad as some have led on.    https://www.si.com/nfl/panthers/onsi/news/much-maligned-panthers-db-way-better-than-think      
    • Nah it was Graham. I remember watching it live.
×
×
  • Create New...