Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Interesting Matt Moore Facts

Carolina Crazy V2

By Carolina Crazy V2,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Dpantherman Apprentice

Dpantherman

Posted
Posted

btw in 2008 Jake had 9 games w/ at least 60% of his passes completed, we won all but 1 which was @ATL...he had only 3 interceptions throughout those games.

in 2009 we won 2 of his 5 60% passing game, in spite of his 7 interceptions.

Basically, you win games when your QB completes alot of passes, and doesn't turn it over. among other things

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted

The Panthers are undefeated when Matt Moore completes 60% or more of his passes.

2007:

2-0 when over 60%

1-5 when under 60%

2008:

Did not play

2009:

4-0 when over 60%

1-2 when under 60%

2010:

1-0 when over 60%

0-3 when under 60%

Also, we have only lost two games ever when he throws for over 7 yards per pass.

Moore started 3 games in 07 not 8.

3 in 10 not 4.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Dpantherman Apprentice

Dpantherman

Posted
Posted

If Jake could make us win, Matt can to if he just takes care of the ball. I have never been impressed with him, but when he plays without pressure he is pretty good. With our season shot, he should be pretty loose.

I think this is where I disagree with some of you. I get last season, but those guys are just jawing for the media, they believe they are in it, until they are mathematically eliminated. So the "no pressure" thing doesn't fly. And there was plenty of pressure to win our first game of the season, thats why he was started in the place of Clausen...to win.

and no Im not a Moore jock sniffer. This was the guy with the Clausen avatar a few weeks ago...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
panthers55 Grand Master

panthers55

Posted
Posted

Moore started 3 games in 07 not 8.

3 in 10 not 4.

He is including every game he played in, not his starts. Yeah, it doesn't mean much to include games where he wasn't the starter and didn't throw the majority of the passes but whatever. THe only stat that matters is that he has over a 60% winning percentage in games he started.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MaxiMus Newbie

MaxiMus

Posted
Posted

Whether you are in the playoff hunt or not, there is pressure to perform week in and week out in the NFL. There is no such thing as "no pressure" games. You must perform or you are an insurance agent or working construction the following week. NFL careers are short enough, so performing at a high level every day is a must. That IS pressure!! So, the "no pressure" argument is weak.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
philp Apprentice

philp

Posted
Posted

Whether you are in the playoff hunt or not, there is pressure to perform week in and week out in the NFL. There is no such thing as "no pressure" games. You must perform or you are an insurance agent or working construction the following week. NFL careers are short enough, so performing at a high level every day is a must. That IS pressure!! So, the "no pressure" argument is weak.

maybe for backups trying to stay on the team the following year

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Carolinator Newbie

Carolinator

Posted
Posted

The Panthers are undefeated when Matt Moore completes 60% or more of his passes.

2007:

2-0 when over 60%

1-5 when under 60%

2008:

Did not play

2009:

4-0 when over 60%

1-2 when under 60%

2010:

1-0 when over 60%

0-3 when under 60%

Also, we have only lost two games ever when he throws for over 7 yards per pass.

Are those completed passes to the defense?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Navy_football
      Carolina Still Not Respected

      By Navy_football · Posted

      I guess so. Don't think I was involved with previous discussions.  Tepper is one of the newest owners in the NFL. Dan is going into his 3rd season as a GM - ever. Dave is going into his 3rd season as a HC - ever. Before becoming a HC, he was an OC/playcaller for one season total. Idzik is about to go into his 1st year as a play caller - ever. WRs are rookies, sophomores and 3rd year guys - though the experienced 3rd year guys are XL and Coker (who has missed a ton of games). TEs are guys going into their 2nd and 3rd seasons, and Tommy Tremble - though Sanders has missed a ton of games. QB has played 3 years. Chuba is an experienced RB, but Brooks and Etienne have taken very little snaps at the position. O-line is more experienced vets with some talent - which is HUGE. Need them to stay healthy. I mean the offense is very young in every aspect except O-line. You see it differently?
    • electro's horse
      The "now it's been three years" Grade for the 2023 Draft

      By electro's horse · Posted

      probably the 2nd worst draft in team history
    • tukafan21
      Strength of Schedule

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      I said this ALL last season and will say it again this year. Our record means diddly squat this year, I don't care if we have 0 wins or 17 wins, I only care about one thing and one thing only. Bryce proves without a shadow of a doubt that he IS or ISN'T our long term solution at QB. It's the only thing that matters for the same reason it sucks that this is the same thing as last year.  This needs to be determined, and if they can't determine it, then it's still telling the team the answer, just not the one they want to hear. As right now we're in the ultimate QB purgatory, a position that dooms franchises for years.  Just look at a team like the Cardinals, who extended a better QB and it still screwed them over and haven't had a contending team in a long time. People get too caught up on wins and losses when evaluating players, particularly QBs.  When people look at the final record and use that as a reason to want to extend a QB or not is just a fools errand.  If we had lost 2-3 more games last year because we didn't make a last second FG, I genuinely wonder if we would have just moved on from Bryce this offseason (like we should have been doing anyways IMHO).
×
×
  • Create New...