Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

SO...


The Saltman

Recommended Posts

That's what I was tryin to get at.

A fat or ugly chick in the group makes the rest of the girls hotter by default.

you guys really think that's the way WE think? Thats the way you guys think. We aren't saying, hey, I wanna hang out with this girl b/c in the end, I'm gonna look hotter next to her. I really don't think that is the case at all.

A girl is hot or ugly no matter what. Someone standing beside her is not going to change anything except for the way YOU view us, not the way we see ourselves. I could care less if the girl standing beside me "makes" me look hot, I don't even understand how that is possible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

you guys really think that's the way WE think? Thats the way you guys think. We aren't saying, hey, I wanna hang out with this girl b/c in the end, I'm gonna look hotter next to her. I really don't think that is the case at all.

A girl is hot or ugly no matter what. Someone standing beside her is not going to change anything except for the way YOU view us, not the way we see ourselves. I could care less if the girl standing beside me "makes" me look hot, I don't even understand how that is possible.

We are saying that's what most girls think. You are the exception to the rule because most women do not like football or will tolerate the functional retards on the Huddle.

You always see these type of examples anywhere you go:

hilarious_138.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • A 12 year old playing madden can draft better than anyone the panthers have had under David Tepper 
    • Throw in the fact that you have to overpay free agents to come here.  Everyone wants to win--or at least have a decent chance at winning. This followed the Bryce Young trade up draft.  That is the draft that crippled an already crippled franchise.   They moved up to #1 and paid the king's ransom only to admit that they weren't sure who they were going to draft--then they picked the wrong guy....amazing incompetence. Now let's take a look at the AT trade--we basically got some future mid round draft capital.  Minnesota has a QB on their roster who reads quickly, is accurate, and is only 24.  (Brosmer).  Minnesota is keeping him on the roster because on the PS, they would lose him.  Is he the answer if we traded AT for him?  Maybe not, but there is potential--as much potential as you will find on day 3 of the draft.  He would be, at worst, the best backup QB on the roster.  Now, did we give Dalton a ton because he has a good relationship with Young?  What if Young does not work out?   Then you have 2 mistakes and no QB. I dunno--I believe in competition, and I believe there should always be efforts to improve the roster--are we trying to make ourselves not look inept?  With Baker and Darnold leaving Charlotte for successful turnarounds, are we capable of having a good QB?   Cam was natural ability and he had the Alpha gene, and we drove him into the ground.
    • When he looks like trash this week against the Cardinals what's going to be the excuse?
×
×
  • Create New...