Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Thoughts on Boobs...


Zod

Recommended Posts

I think its a safe bet that I have seen more boobs of everyday women (not strippers) in person than anyone else on this site.

Here is a new theory I am working on.

The size of the boobs is not as important as the ratio of the size of hips/waist to boobs. That is, a girl that is a size 2 in jeans can have a small B cup and look much better than a girl that is a size 8 with a C cup. Yes, her boobs are bigger but the ratio of waist to boobs is not as appealing.

It is for this reason that no one is interested in seeing big boobs on obese women. Even though the boobs are very large, the belly is also very large thus the appeal is just not there.

I am submitting this postulate to a few peer reviewed publications for further analysis.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My aunt told me last night that my tits looked bigger. I told her if I lost a little weight, they probably would go down a little bit. She told me the first place where women gain weight is in their boobs. I told her I should just gain more weight then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would prefer the size 8 woman with the C cup. I don't really care fore women that look like they just went to a Holocaust Summer camp for vacation.

lol size 8 is a little past the holocaust.

your thinking more size 0.

some people are just small though and cant help they have to wear small clothes, but that doesn't mean they are deathly skinny!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/46683459/2025-nfl-offseason-tiers-32-teams-best-worst-signings-trades-draft-barnwell Slightly above expectations Highlights: Trading WR Adam Thielen, signing RB Rico Dowdle (one year, $2.8 million), drafting fifth-round TE Mitchell Evans   Disappointments: Re-signing CB Mike Jackson (two years, $10.5 million)   The Panthers chose the right time to move on from Thielen, who had been productive in Carolina before being dealt to Minnesota just before the season. He has been lost in the shuffle there. While the Panthers won't see the fourth-round pick that forms the bulk of the return for Thielen until 2027, getting out from what was owed to a player who has 47 receiving yards in Minnesota is an easy victory. Dowdle has been a revelation since moving into the starting lineup after Chuba Hubbard's injury, becoming one of a handful of players in NFL history to produce consecutive 200-yard scrimmage games. The former Cowboys back was averaging 3 yards per carry before the opportunity, so I'm not sure I would count on him playing like Jim Brown the rest of the way in a rotational role alongside Hubbard. But it's hard to argue that Carolina hasn't already gotten its $2.8 million worth out of the 27-year-old back. Most of Carolina's biggest moves are either tracking to be right around expectation (drafting wide receiver Tetairoa McMillan) or have been impacted by unexpected injuries (signing defensive tackle Tershawn Wharton). Jackson was a pleasant surprise as a starter in 2024, and he hasn't been terrible this season, but most of the big plays against Carolina have come on throws against the former Seahawks cornerback. Overall, though, this has been a very reasonable offseason for the Panthers
    • How would you have taken the guy who was picked ahead of us? That makes no sense.
    • I am not denying that things were said. That wasn’t my point. But carry on this will go nowhere.    Oh snap, the post calling him a liar was like three posts before you jumped in.  what do you get, a post a page? 
×
×
  • Create New...