Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Progression of David Gettis


Carl Spackler

Recommended Posts

Question for anyone who has the game on DVR...was Gettis just not targeted like he should be against STL, or was he covered well and unable to get open most of the game? I'd like to see film of him last week to find out whether he was getting overlooked or Spagnuolo watched his tendencies against SF and he was found out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it has to do more with LaFell being a better blocker and Fox liking that attribute in a #2 receiver since we are a "run first" team. I was appalled at his lack of snaps/targets considering his previous performance but after Fox said the SF game was "too aggressive" it shouldn't surprise me at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The better question is...why can Matt Moore see the field better, and spread the ball around better in one game....and not the next?

Was the rams pass rush that much better that moore was as comfortable making his reads?

He didn't show that tendancy in his games prior to this season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The better question is...why can Matt Moore see the field better, and spread the ball around better in one game....and not the next?

Was the rams pass rush that much better that moore was as comfortable making his reads?

He didn't show that tendancy in his games prior to this season.

Because fans don't know what they are watching.

When he completes a pass to the left to his first read and after the defender leaves the other receiver the other receiver jumps up and down. Uninformed fan goes "Aw we coulda had a TD"

Also when he does read the field, established #1 receiver along with other receivers give up on routes and leave QB hanging out to dry. Now QB only tries to hit first read.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Because fans don't know what they are watching.

When he completes a pass to the left to his first read and after the defender leaves the other receiver the other receiver jumps up and down. Uninformed fan goes "Aw we coulda had a TD"

Also when he does read the field, established #1 receiver along with other receivers give up on routes and leave QB hanging out to dry. Now QB only tries to hit first read.

I think that Moore doesn't know what he is seeing, or he just can't compute what is happening fast enough.

For example, the first play from scrimmage, the "flea-flicker".

Yes, the safety did not commit to the run. However, he had not committed to cover deep either, he was frozen. Lafell had his man beat and the safety was last man standing. The safety was still turned to the LOS and with a full head of steam Lafell would have burned by him easily. Moore should have realized this and gone deep to Lafell, but he can not visualize how a play is going to form he only sees what the play is at the moment.

Instead of seeing that the safety was going to have to turn and get to speed to catch Lafell who was already at full speed, Moore flips out and throws a falling down pass to Smith who was the crossing under route and an INT.

Horrible play. What should have at the least been an incompletion and a sign to the Rams that we were going to stretch the field instead turns into a disaster because of his incompetence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think that Moore doesn't know what he is seeing, or he just can't compute what is happening fast enough.

For example, the first play from scrimmage, the "flea-flicker".

Yes, the safety did not commit to the run. However, he had not committed to cover deep either, he was frozen. Lafell had his man beat and the safety was last man standing. The safety was still turned to the LOS and with a full head of steam Lafell would have burned by him easily. Moore should have realized this and gone deep to Lafell, but he can not visualize how a play is going to form he only sees what the play is at the moment.

Instead of seeing that the safety was going to have to turn and get to speed to catch Lafell who was already at full speed, Moore flips out and throws a falling down pass to Smith who was the crossing under route and an INT.

Horrible play. What should have at the least been an incompletion and a sign to the Rams that we were going to stretch the field instead turns into a disaster because of his incompetence.

While you show his "incompetence" in one play I can show a play where he has been competent.

The redemption TD pass to Gettis against SF. It was 3rd down and 2 and Smitty is dragging underneath at about 5 yards and is fairly wide open. Gettis in no way has his man beat by that much but Moore "visualized" how the play would turn out and threw it to Gettis for the TD. If he isn't confident in the way that play turns out then he leaves himself and the team in a 4th and 2.

Tell me what other bad decisions he made in the STL game because honestly there weren't many. It's been said many times on here, and alluded to by Smith, and by Fox that the last pick was Smith's fault. The second pick was not a decision problem but rather his arm got hit as he threw.

I just want to see some of his "incompetence" on display.

Edit:

Please note a "Moore homer" did not turn this thread into a Matt Moore thread but rather someone else did. It was a perfectly good topic to discuss from LPF and it got ruined.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think that Moore doesn't know what he is seeing, or he just can't compute what is happening fast enough.

For example, the first play from scrimmage, the "flea-flicker".

Yes, the safety did not commit to the run. However, he had not committed to cover deep either, he was frozen. Lafell had his man beat and the safety was last man standing. The safety was still turned to the LOS and with a full head of steam Lafell would have burned by him easily. Moore should have realized this and gone deep to Lafell, but he can not visualize how a play is going to form he only sees what the play is at the moment.

Instead of seeing that the safety was going to have to turn and get to speed to catch Lafell who was already at full speed, Moore flips out and throws a falling down pass to Smith who was the crossing under route and an INT.

Horrible play. What should have at the least been an incompletion and a sign to the Rams that we were going to stretch the field instead turns into a disaster because of his incompetence.

It is much simpler than that. Moore throws to the guys he can see have separation or are open rather than throwing to a spot where he knows the receiver is supposed to be because he has no confidence in the receiver being there. There is no chemistry at all. Guys aren't picking up hot reads, receivers are breaking off routes, even Smitty didn't even turn around on that ball to him for the interception.

Moore has been burned enough by receivers not being where they are supposed to be that he is gun shy to throw it unless he can see he is open. Problem is though, that by the time the ball gets there the safety or help over the top has arrived as well.

I wouldn't disagree that Moore sometimes doesn't see the field or locks on one guy, but I also think that the receivers have given him little help in building the chemistry needed for a quarterback to fire the ball before a receiver breaks knowing he is going to be there when the ball arrives.

It is hard to say at this point whose fault it is without knowing what was called in the huddle. But the end result is poor play and lack of a passing game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I can only imagine the **** eating grins on the committee right now. "Oh, Bama didn't deserve it? Oh, Miami didn't deserve it? Suck it, haters!" lol
    • To say that, is gaslighting, because it isn’t true. I mean, maybe one or two people do that but it isn’t the predominant behavior. Even Frank has given him credit. I think particularly the Rams game. A couple of glowing posts.   I know I have. Gotta be honest about it because if you aren’t it undermines what else you say.  But the degree of how far I go with credit, in terms of it being a projection of future performance? Not very far. Acknowledge it, but require more of it. There is a lot of bad play to offset.    I tried to remain passive while the last 9 games (post ankle injury) played out. It is just really hard when the lows won’t go away. I failed. As high as a couple of those highs were, there isn’t enough.    I know it is premature to just say I want to move on, made my decision after 6 of those games ended up pretty much really good or not good enough, but I have had enough of being patient and letting him show the reality either way.  So in my view, he Could still validate himself to a decent degree if he smokes the last three starts. But also in my view I don’t expect to see it. Maybe one more high quality start, would be my expectation. So yes he could still somehow justify having the job next year. If that happened I still wouldn’t have much faith given the last three years and all that has transpired. Again, there is a lot of bad play to offset. 
    • To start with, you wouldn’t want to count up that value chart. You would see quickly where that is headed. But you basically did a quantity comparison, while ignoring quality.  I am looking at 2023 as the start, because it became all about Bryce.  2023 you have 4 picks plus DJ Moore for offense vs 2 (80 and 145) for defense.  2024 you got the 1st overall, the 32, the 46 and the 101 for offense vs 72, 157, 200 and 240 for defense. Leave the FA IOL out of it. Which was a crazy big  investment. But it wasn’t draft.  Anyway, that is basically 4 top 100 picks for offense and 4 picks for defense in 2024. Except they were 2 first rounders, the second rounder, and the 4th was really high at 101. Vs 72 and day three stuff. Please….  Second quoted/bolded… See you think we hate Bryce. That isn’t it at all. It is nice easy way to characterize us and discredit our talking points though.   Me, I do mostly hate watching him play. But I don’t hate the person. I hate the hell out of the stanning.  It started with the very first question I asked about his footwork, arm strength, and size. Height being the principle objection. I never even got to the durability factor. There was plenty without factoring that in.  But there was rabid opposition to even asking the question of what a couple of small fractions of a second extra closing time would do for the defenders.  What the extra time it takes to flip the hips would do vs a pass rush or on the other end after the ball is in the air. Split second more for recognition where it is going for the DBs.  The tippy toe backpedal.  That poo was a mess and it has always been mess but no Bryce fan wanted to hear it. “Go get another team to root for”. “It worked in the SEC it will be fine in the NFL you don’t know football you are just a hater”.  It got worse when the real games started. It has never stopped. It is nice that many people have left that train so there is less abuse but it hasn’t stopped.  So whatever… 
×
×
  • Create New...