Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Would You Be Happy with Mike Goodson as the Future at RB?


TylerDurden

Recommended Posts

We've all raved about his performances for the most part this year including today's effort, and most felt the bromance after his performance in the preseason last year...

That being said, with all the uncertainty of our players on expirings, how would you feel about Goodson being 'the man' going forward?

I love DWill and would want him to retire as a Panther, if possible. But, we're looking at having to let one of these guys go out of DWill, Stewart, or Goodson because there's just too much talent in the backfield when they're all healthy. So who would it be?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, I would like that too. But, I just don't know how we can do it and if all three guys would be willing to stick around to share carries long-term. I think of the Cowboys and their 3 RBs... I honestly, don't believe each one of them could be the full-time starter by himself on another team.

With our guys, thinking objectively as possible, I DO think each of them could start on another team. Ideally, I'd like to keep all of them but I just don't know how long we can keep Goodson under the radar without involving him more for the long-term.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The main problem we have from here out is that we currently have 5 backs that various times all look good. Vaughn looked good today - Sutton has looked good at times - D-Will and Stew have a history of being good (but have now become injury prone).

I'd keep: D-Will or Stew (but not both), Goodson, Vaughn, Sutton and find some way for at least 2 of the 3 to be on the field every play - some plays all 3 with 1 in the slot.

Trade either D-Will or Stew while they still have some value.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello, soccer fans [crickets, tumbleweed flies by]. The World Cup kicks off in less than 2 weeks and, well, 🇺🇸USA USA USA🇺🇸 and all. We beat Senegal 3-2 yesterday in a tune-up friendly at BoA, with Christian Pulisic finally entering the scoring column.  How will we do in the World Cup once our tournament kicks off on the 12th? Well, there are 48 teams (assuming Iran is there) and it feels like one of two thing happens: we get grouped for the first time since '98, or we make it to the Round of 16 for the third time in the last four World Cups. I tried out the lottery for an Atlanta game and struck out, so yesterday was as World Cup as I'll get for in-person ($285/ticket for like Norway vs $39/ticket for USMNT right beforehand was a layup).  The U.S. has a travel-heavy schedule in group play, playing in LA, Seattle and LA. Real road warrior mentality being built. Glad the east coast gets worse kickoff times for a NA World Cup than a Qatar World Cup.
    • Well, that's the thing. Drafting players only for their physical measurables as you are suggesting only really happened during 2024, and X unfortunately has become the poster child for that. To be clear, it's not necessarily about drafting RAS over skill, but RAS over NFL-readiness and/or a solid body of work. Lots of players show skill in college, but those skills don't necessarily translate to the NFL for a multitude of reasons. But, getting back to the main point, to be clear, I believe that our FO is still enamored with physical gifts (who wouldn't be?), but now they're letting Dr. Eric Eager's proprietary system--his "secret sauce" prioritize the players that the Panthers draft, and it seems like it weighs not only a solid body of work, relative to a college career of course, but consistent gradual improvement as evidenced by production pretty highly. 
    • Its a good article about how pathetically bad our past drafts ('23 and '24) have been. Building the team in '23 since we weren't ready yet and taking your qb in '24 made so much more sense in hindsight. Ladd McConkey over XL is pretty much a given but not sure it does as much to change Bryce's trajectory as the author suggests.  As bad as '23 and '24 drafts were, the '25 and '26 really give me hope.  
×
×
  • Create New...