Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Where do we rank?


Pejorative Miscreant

Recommended Posts

Worst teams in recent NFL (not in any particular order)

1. Last years Rams (1-15) Most recent very bad team

2. 2008 Lions (0-16) Ranks worst based on wins but probably not the worst ever

3. 2001 Panthers (1-15) Nice outing by George.

4. 2007 Dolphins (1-15) Saban cut and run

5. 2006 Raiders (2-14) Dysfunctional team. Probably worse than the '08 Lions

6. 1996 Jets (1-15) Terrible

7. 1980 Aints (1-15) Manning had a pretty good year but that is all.

8. 1990 Pats (1-15) 1 win by 2 points

9. 1991 Colts (1-15) Very Bad

10 1992 Seahawks (2-14) Averaged less than 9 points a game

1976 Bucs only played 14 games so I left them off the list. As much as I hate Dallas I gave the 1989 Cowgirls a pardon because it was the beginning of the Dynasty.

That said I think the Panthers have a chance of breaking into this "elite" territory.

Thoughts

Link to comment
Share on other sites

don't really give a shi*t concerning where we rank on the failure tree. Just want to get past this and enjoy better days.

ps.....since you gave the cowpukes a pass ....what's to say we aren't at the beginning of a great run right now?

So are you in the "don't give a sh*t" category or "we might be in the beginning of a great run" category?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hidden

Let's have a look-see at some statistics:

Right now we are averaging 4.1 yards per play on offense. To compare:

1. 2009 Rams - 4.5 ypp

2. 2008 Lions - 4.7 ypp

3. 2001 Panthers - 4.4 ypp

4. 2007 Dolphins 4.7 ypp

5. 2006 Raiders 4.2 ypp

6. 1996 Jets 4.8 ypp

7. 1980 Aints 5.2 ypp

8. 1990 Pats 4.4 ypp

9. 1991 Colts 4.1 ypp

10 1992 Seahawks 3.6 ypp

So, of all the teams you listed, only 92 Seahawks were worse while the 91 Colts were tied in ypp.

Defensive ypp.

2010 Panthers: 5.0 ypp

1. 2009 Rams - 5.9 ypp

2. 2008 Lions - 6.4 ypp

3. 2001 Panthers - 5.6 ypp

4. 2007 Dolphins 5.6 ypp

5. 2006 Raiders 4.6 ypp

6. 1996 Jets 5.4 ypp

7. 1980 Aints 5.6 ypp

8. 1990 Pats 5.9 ypp

9. 1991 Colts 5.3 ypp

10 1992 Seahawks 4.6 ypp

Of the teams listed, the 2010 Panthers are only worse than the 06 Raiders and the 92 Seahawks in Defensive YPP

Off. PPG:

2010 Panthers: 11.6 ppg

1. 2009 Rams - 10.9 ppg

2. 2008 Lions - 16.8 ppg

3. 2001 Panthers - 15.8 ppg

4. 2007 Dolphins 16.7 ppg

5. 2006 Raiders 10.5 ppg

6. 1996 Jets 17.4 ppg

7. 1980 Aints 18.2 ppg

8. 1990 Pats 11.3 ppg

9. 1991 Colts 8.9 ppg

10 1992 Seahawks 8.8 ppg

So far, we are better than the 92 Hawks, 91 Colts, 90 Pats, 06 Raiders, and 09 Rams for scoring per game of the teams listed in the OP.

Def PPG:

2010 Panthers: 23.9 ppg

1. 2009 Rams - 27.2 ppg

2. 2008 Lions - 32.3 ppg

3. 2001 Panthers - 25.6 ppg

4. 2007 Dolphins 27.3 ppg

5. 2006 Raiders 20.8 ppg

6. 1996 Jets 28.4 ppg

7. 1980 Aints 30.4 ppg

8. 1990 Pats 27.9 ppg

9. 1991 Colts 23.8 ppg

10 1992 Seahawks 19.5 ppg

Giving up less points than all but 91 Colts, 92 Hawks, and 06 Raiders.

Point Differential/game:

2010 Panthers: -12.3 ppg

1. 2009 Rams -16.3 ppg

2. 2008 Lions -15.6 ppg

3. 2001 Panthers -9.8 ppg

4. 2007 Dolphins -10.6 ppg

5. 2006 Raiders -10.2 ppg

6. 1996 Jets -10.9 ppg

7. 1980 Aints -12.2 ppg

8. 1990 Pats -16.6 ppg

9. 1991 Colts -14.9 ppg

10 1992 Seahawks -10.8 ppg

So, we're better than 4 teams listed: 91 Colts, 90 Pats, 08 Lions, and 09 Rams, while worse than the rest.

Just confirms that our offense is what is making us as bad as we are. So far, I would say we definitely deserve to be mentioned on an all-time worse team list, and definitely an all-time worst offense list.

Note: we are only better than the 96 Jets and the 06 Raiders in turnover margin/game. The 2001 Panthers actually ended up +1 in turnover margin for the year.

Link to comment

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It's also worth noting that Cam himself said that he felt safer when running vs. sitting in the pocket because he could see the contact coming and prepare for it. A QB running the ball doesn't have to be a sledgehammer. He just has to be effective.
    • That Falcons game is about as good as it gets. Especially on the road. I know the Falcons defense was bad but he was cooking with Coker, an undrafted rookie get the bulk of the receptions. If your QB has 5 TDs and 0 turnovers he is playing like a top QB, yardage be damned. The big question for me is how consistently can be play the whole season?  I don’t expect a game like that every week, but I also don’t want to see any performances like the pre benching or that Cowboys game (which was bad post benching). Bryce’s best shot at being the guy is becoming a mini-Burrow who is about as consistent as you can get at the QB position.  The good news is this QB class should be a fun one. So hopefully Bryce becomes the guy, if not it’s a nice class to let DC pick his QB and they should come into a great situation with a good OL, RB, young talented WRs etc…
    • Bryce Young is far less risky with his body when he runs than Richardson and doesn’t take many unnecessary big hits. Was much more worried about injury when he had that abysmal OL his rookie season than I ever would be when he runs/scrambles. 500/10 seems like a fairly reasonable prediction considering he had 250/6 in 12 starts last season. Of course literally anybody CAN get hurt, it’s just that we were assured by many huddlers that it was a sure thing with Bryce Young that he wouldn’t make it to this point in his career without significant injuries.
×
×
  • Create New...