Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

If you consider this a good game from Jimmy


TheRealDeal

Recommended Posts

I don't worry about what other QB's are doing. Every individual is different and qb's will develope at a different pace. Clausen has improved, and thats really all that matters for us. If he continues to improve, then he could be a good QB for us.

FWIW, Clausen's improved play is partially related to gains in experience by Lafell and Gettis. The improved running game helps a lot as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't worry about what other QB's are doing. Every individual is different and qb's will develope at a different pace. Clausen has improved, and thats really all that matters for us. If he continues to improve, then he could be a good QB for us.

FWIW, Clausen's improved play is partially related to gains in experience by Lafell and Gettis. The improved running game helps a lot as well.

:confused: Sooooooooo what do you consider Bradford's game?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Would you consider Andrew Luck's game irrelevant if he does the same thing as Bradford and we pass on him? Get over your man crush on Clausen because Andrew Luck is going to be the pick if he declares.

I'd hope we pick Luck.

Again, what does this have to do with Clausen?

Or do you think Pike, BSP, Null or AE could put up Bradford-like numbers?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm just trying to get a gauge on expectations.

Are our expectations that low that Clausen is in a category of his own, even with players with the same experience as him?

Is there "Jimmy" good, "Jimmy" bad, "Jimmy" great, then normal levels of good, bad, and great? Where do the "Jimmy" levels fall?

Can he not be compared to other rookies, regardless of where they were picked?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm just trying to get a gauge on expectations.

Are our expectations that low that Clausen is in a category of his own, even with players with the same experience as him?

Is there "Jimmy" good, "Jimmy" bad, "Jimmy" great, then normal levels of good, bad, and great? Where do the "Jimmy" levels fall?

Can he not be compared to other rookies, regardless of where they were picked?

Sure, Bradford looks way better than Clausen. Hell, Bradford in the first half of that game looked better than anyone this week so far.

I'll let you in on a little secret, too.

The Rams look better than the Panthers. By a mile... and not just at quarterback, but the entire damn team from coach on down looks better this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Roger all that. Do you think BY avoided any sacks last game? This oline is not what you're touting them to be. They are much better then 2023! Much much much better than 2023. But come on now, you'd expect this expensive oline (most are run blocking specialist) to at least dominate in the run game every game.  And... I keep telling you our WRs and TEs are not that good yet. I mean last Sunday was a prime example. Our receiving targets never make plays like those. Never. And this is from one of the worst teams in the league. Shough could have easily had 3 INTs if not for his receivers making plays on the ball. Our guys just don't do that. XL almost allowed an INT backing up out of bounds instead of coming to the ball. And everyone would have blamed that on BY. That's why he doesn't throw to that dude. I can't recall a game except maybe the second Falcons game - maybe, where I thought our receivers could possibly be better than the other team's. I think TMac and Coker have a lot of potential. But they're aren't consistent. But they're young and WILL improve. I'm confident of that.  I don't agree that BY was drafted to only stand in the pocket. He has always been best off schedule - for better or worse. 
    • Do you think you will get a direct answer?  Icky giving up 5 pressures (playing hurt in his defense) by himself and Bryce only getting sacked once tells you he played well in the pocket.  He extended plays and converted some tough downs.  
    • I've been very apprehensive about potentially firing yet another head coach. But Canales needs to focus on being a head coach first and foremost and begin handing off some responsibilities like playcalling duties and begin overseeing the entire team or we need to assess all possible ideal HC candidates in the offseason.
×
×
  • Create New...