Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Front 7 will be solid in 2011


MHS831

Recommended Posts

To be optimistic (that means to look on the bright side, App Nation), you have to like the LB situation here. First, I really like what I have seen from Jason Williams. Anderson should stay and get paid, Beason and Conner give us the best MLB combo in the NFL, and TD should re-sign on the cheap. Throw in special teamers Senn and Norwood, and Jamar Williams--wow.

Expect to see improvement from Hardy and Brown. Johnson is becoming a beast. Don't expect to see Brayton back, but who knows. Norwood to step in as DE more? depends on the coaches. Damn I hope we could somehow keep Brian Baker (DL Coach).

At DT, Landri has shown his ability to penetrate, but only against run blocking (as far as I have seen). Because Hurney can't draft DT in the middle rounds (Hayden, Irvin, Ellison, etc.) and the Ed Johnson experiment is ending sadly, we need a free agent 1 technique who will draw double teams to free out LBs. We could also use a 3 technique to collapse the pocket. If we draft Luck as many suggest, since we have Armanti Edwards instead of the 33rd pick in the 2011 draft, we will not have another pick until the third round. DT has to be that pick, but getting what we need in the third will be tough. We better be scouting the second tier prospects hard.

I think we have to spend on DT in free agency. Period.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What about Haynesworth? If he is motivated he is a dominating player...not sure I want that baggage though. This, like everything, will depend on the next coach. I heard that someone mentioned the possiblility of trading down from one picking up extra picks and maybe even getting cam newton in the first instead. That would give us some extra picks, plus we have two thirds (one we can't trade) so we could use one to get back in the second round. Hurney is good at moving around. So there are a ton of options to look at...especially the draft although I don't know how strong the DT class is this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Trading down would be nice. Until I see Clausen improve, it would be stupid to pass on Luck. As for the Haynesworth idea, the idea has to enter the thought process, but I would not touch him unless we reconstructed the contract, making it incentive-based.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Newton scares me. I compare him to Vince Young, but I see a little something more. I think he could be good, but I don't want my NFL QB running the ball. They don't last long. Locker does the same thing, and his SR year has been dismal. Mallett needs to learn the pro-style offense, so Luck is the best pick. I think you have to take him at this point. Now, if Clausen finished the season with a 90+ passer rating....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agreed that a DT is a must. I think we take a good FA if we can and a draft the best DT available after we secure our QB of the future. If Luck is available we better not screw up and pass on him. I love watching running QB's but yes they usually don't last long. Clausen is not showing much so depending on him for the future will probably make the next coaches stay here short.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Newton scares me. I compare him to Vince Young, but I see a little something more. I think he could be good, but I don't want my NFL QB running the ball. They don't last long. Locker does the same thing, and his SR year has been dismal. Mallett needs to learn the pro-style offense, so Luck is the best pick. I think you have to take him at this point. Now, if Clausen finished the season with a 90+ passer rating....

Really? Newton reminds me more of Josh freeman. I really thought he was a run first guy but I think he is just so physically gifted in that area that he is just really successful doing it. But he has a great arm, is very accurate and can throw on the run. To me he may need a year to develop but he has amazing potential. Luck is clearly the best prospect and I would love to have him but DT and other positions need to be addressed so more picks may be better in the long run. However if it were me I'd pick luck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At this point what to with the front seven will depend on what type of defense we run this year. Not just 3-4 versus 4-3 but whether we play mostly attacking 1 gap style, 2 gap contain and control, a 4-3 over/under, Miami 4-3, etc. You have to have the personnel to run your style of defense or adapt the style to your personnel. We have players that can be effective in certain schemes but guys like Brown will need to bulk up quite a bit in order to handle the run.

I don't think that Meek's system is fundamentally sound and is easily exploited so it is hard to say what is possible if we got a new DC in here. But I don't think I would say they are going to be fine. At linebacker it looks good if we sign our guys back. At DE we still need another pass rushing stud. But we could get rid of all our DTs and start over and it wouldn't hurt my feelings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At this point what to with the front seven will depend on what type of defense we run this year. Not just 3-4 versus 4-3 but whether we play mostly attacking 1 gap style, 2 gap contain and control, a 4-3 over/under, Miami 4-3, etc. You have to have the personnel to run your style of defense or adapt the style to your personnel. We have players that can be effective in certain schemes but guys like Brown will need to bulk up quite a bit in order to handle the run.

I don't think that Meek's system is fundamentally sound and is easily exploited so it is hard to say what is possible if we got a new DC in here. But I don't think I would say they are going to be fine. At linebacker it looks good if we sign our guys back. At DE we still need another pass rushing stud. But we could get rid of all our DTs and start over and it wouldn't hurt my feelings.

Yeah, I see those points. It is hard when so much is up in the air. I think Hardy and Brown can hold down a DE spot and be effective pass rushers, but the run is a concern. Johnson is a complete DE now. It takes time. I am counting on Hardy and Brown to come around in 2011. They have the talent, but I feel better about Hardy than Brown. I just think a stud DT could change our opinions of our DEs.

If I had my choice, I would keep Landri and throw the rest out. Having said that, I feel we need to draft a DT in the third round (assuming we draft a QB in the first) and sign a top free agent DT. No more bargain shopping. Get a stud. In the third, a player like Jarvis from Clemson or Crick from Nebraska if he falls to the 65th pick. Blue collar studs who demand double teams. Jarvis should get some credit for Bowers' success at Clemson and Crick is tough as a bag of nails. Then add a veteran or two.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

truth be told, if we could trade down a few spots and pick up a team's first and second round pick (plus maybe a few more, who knows, that pick is valuable if the CBA is in place), I'd be all for it. Draft That dirty CB from LSU in the first then grab a DT in the early second, or vice-versa depending on who's available and what not. hell maybe even an O-line. I'd be ok with giving clausen another year just cause it is too early to tell with him.

my gut says he will suck but i've been wrong before. Maybe my gut has just been sipping the Luck kool-aid for way too long. But I do think jimmy has shown some improvements since his first start, It's just not as much as I had hoped.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Newton scares me. I compare him to Vince Young, but I see a little something more. I think he could be good, but I don't want my NFL QB running the ball.

Really? Newton reminds me more of Josh freeman. I really thought he was a run first guy but I think he is just so physically gifted in that area that he is just really successful doing it. But he has a great arm, is very accurate and can throw on the run. To me he may need a year to develop but he has amazing potential.

Newton reminds me of Ryan Leaf

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Newton reminds me of Ryan Leaf

Me too, now that you mention it. However, I give the SEC more credit for exposing frauds than the PAC 10, which is why you could say the same for Luck. Imagine how dumb even the experts are when it comes to picking QBs--Ryan Leaf and the best QB to ever play NFL football were considered a toss up. I suppose that is why work ethic and character are so important.

Speaking of Character, I know Peyton Manning used to conduct the band at UT, but I see Newton as more of an ego that is accepted because times are good, but potentially a problem during adversity. Not fair to say that without concrete evidence, but there is some smoke that suggests he was not raised under a strict code of ethics. Manning and Leaf may have been equal at one point, but after they got paid, Manning went to work, while Leaf thought his natural ability would carry him. Newton's natural ability is awesome, but a QB in the NFL needs to study and improve. Leaf, Vick I, Vince Young, Jamarcus Russell, and countless others had the tools, but not the noodle to succeed. Hard work and humility are part of the equation.

On that note, I have seen stuff that Clausen supposedly sent out on Twitter that suggests he is not matured by his new responsibility.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If you are an athlete or former athlete (myself?  Cornhole 2021-present; Disc Golf 2013-got a mega blister and had to retire; speed walking--every black Friday at Walmart 2003-2009) you know what it is to lose confidence.  Self-inflicted or not (in my view, a lot of 2023 was coaching and a lot of 2024 was confidence), he has confidence now. How fragile is it?  I think the light is on, the game slowed down, and he is ready to do his thing.  He seems to be "mobile in the pocket" instead of "running scared."   Last year, there were times when AT was out, Johnson gone, and all he really had was XL and Coker--a raw rookie with upside and an UDFA rookie.  TE was rarely a viable option. It reminded me of Benjamin and Funchess.   Moore had to step up.  This season, Bryce has weapons.  I expect XL to improve.  I expect TMac to help tremendously, and I think Coker will be solid.  Renfrow?  Horn?  bonuses.    
    • His points are valid.  However, it seems a bit based on past performance and fails to take into consideration trends and conditions that might suggest growth in 2025.   For one, he breaks the team down by position and ranks them separately.  I guess that is a fair way to do it, but they are dependent upon each other. Last year, our DL sucked.  That impacts the rest of the defense.  With no internal pressure, the QBs simply step up to avoid the Edge rush.  I would have suggested that the internal DL is now featuring pass rushers and large people who can collapse the pocket.  Secondly, the LBs were not protected very well in 2024.  It is hard to see the holes and step up when a guard is in your earhole a second after the snap.  Finally, the defensive backs will be forced to make fewer tackles and they will be better in pass protection with a new and improved DL.    Canales made an interesting comment the other day, and I (from the outside looking in) feel the same way:  (paraphrasing) "I have never seen a better group of rookies."   I think the biggest concern is the learning curve.  How long before these rookies are ready?   I am bullish on this team.  I think they win 3 of their first 4 and get confident.  The get the fans behind them.  From there, they win 6 of the remaining 13.  If they stay injury free, they have an outside shot at the NFC south.     
    • Biiiiiig eyeroll on this.  First, Look at historical stats of the most recent historical great DBs.  I plucked 3, Revis, Sherman, and Norman (cuzz he was our guy).  Combined post age 30, there are TWO pro bowls between those 3 and wanna get this...ZERO seasons with 16 games started.  ALL missed time.  It is RARE that Corners survive that long in the NFL and its about time we started recognizing this fact.  Jaycee is a good bet because it hasnt been anything seriously devastating injury wise, and with his sample size he could and should be an incredible piece for the panthers through age 30. Jaire kinda flops on the other side, hes 28...so hes under 30, but he wants his payday before it comes up, hes also been injury prone lately.  Bulk of the contract will be on opposite side of 30.  Will both of these guys help us be better in 2026?  SURE!  No doubt, but the question is, will these guys help us past 2026...not sure. The investment isnt worth the risk, nor would the ROI be anywhere close to worth it.  Neither guy is moving us from a 6-8 win team to a 8-10 team, period. My point is we're in this state a 6-8 win team IMO and he projects us as  a 4-6 win team.  EVEN if we think Jaire or Ramsey will make us a 6-8 win team, it in NO WAY is worth the money or capital to move that much just to suck kinda less.  
×
×
  • Create New...