Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Latest on Panthers free agency plans


Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, TheSpecialJuan said:

The #Panthers are still actively looking in the TE & Nickel market.

They are also wanting to re-sign T/G Brady Christensen, per source
 

https://x.com/dixonsydernfl/status/2032091365987754178?s=46&t=xeIgh_-Vr2aKxBkBJdfnKA

Brady is becoming an actual need now. What's his injury status? Will he be ready to play next season? I don't even know if he's injured at the current. Just know he usually is. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, strato said:

The lack of left tackle being next to TE and nickel in that first line is just baffling to me. 


Finding half decent LTs in free agency is rare.

Going to have to draft it.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Jay Roosevelt said:

Not when you consider they're almost certainly targeting a tackle at #19.

Our cupboard is practically bare, and we are depending on a crapshoot from the 19 slot. 
It isn’t what I’d call a strong position 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Tbe said:


Finding half decent LTs in free agency is rare.

Going to have to draft it.

I know but this is a serious deal. The guy from Green Bay is there. Top FA option. He is what I’d call half decent, not trying to say he is anything more. 
 

We are sitting in a precarious position, with RT probably being an option as a position for him if or when we can upgrade or if Icky somehow comes back whole. So we could use him there in the future. He is a three or four year starter. 
 

The longer this draws out with nothing done, the more I see a costly draft day trade up. Rather not. 

Edited by strato
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, strato said:

Our cupboard is practically bare, and we are depending on a crapshoot from the 19 slot. 
It isn’t what I’d call a strong position 

I think they might trade up if they can, if they fall in love with one guy, but if you are OK with Lomu and Proctor (I am), then if Freeling is gone, I sit and wait.  If we trade up, we likely lose our Will ILB or Center of the future.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Jay Roosevelt said:

Not when you consider they're almost certainly targeting a tackle at #19.

I agree we are and should be looking Tackle at #19... But I'm starting to fear we can't find an immediate starting LT at that spot. Only a few guys I think can come right in and be a starter in this draft. So getting a FA that can start if needed should be priority in my opinion. We can't go into the draft HAVING to find a starter at LT. 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, strato said:

I know but this is a serious deal. The guy from Green Bay is there. Top FA option. He is what I’d call half decent, not trying to say he is anything more. 
 

We are sitting in a precarious position, with RT probably being an option as a position for him if or when we can upgrade or if Icky somehow comes back whole. So we could use him there in the future. He is a three or four year starter. 
 

The longer this draws out with nothing done, the more I see a costly draft day trade up. Rather not. 

Must be about money.  They have a QB on a rookie deal and are cap-strapped.  Yikes.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Except it takes those QB's a few years to develop because they needed to learn the mental side of the game and have it catch up to their physical attributes. Bryce was supposed to be a QB savant who already had a fully developed mental side of the game and that was going to make up for his lack of physical ability.  And his lack of NFL level QB physical traits has been clear as day to anyone who has watched him the last 3 years, mainly, he just doesn't have an NFL arm, he can't zip the ball into tight spaces or throw on a line down the field like is needed at this level.
    • Don’t recall seeing many of his interviews but what strikes me is that he engages and goes in depth. Even with the cliche answers as referenced by OP come across somewhat thoughtful.  Very likable personality despite being someone who can crush an average person like I can crush a paper cup. I knew Motons mother had a career at MSU but was looking on the google and found that Mushin Muhammad personally knew Motons grandfather.   His late grandfather was a professor at MSU.   Cool guy.  Interesting family and small world.      
    • I think people aren’t patient enough with Young. It can take a few years for a QB to develop. Look at Darnold, Baker and most recently Daniel Jones.   he hasn’t been able to put up big passing numbers either cause of how much we run the ball. You can tell our coaching staff still hasn’t took the training wheels off Bryce and let him go all out. We’ve had some pretty bad receivers as well. We finally got a true number one last year and look how much Bryce improved. Still we didn’t really have any depth behind TMac. Coker was hurt for a lot of the year and XL was our #2. How many big plays or TDs has XL dropped? I think this year can be the year we see Bryce able to hit his stride. If not then we can start looking for another qb but I just ask people to be patient.
×
×
  • Create New...