Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Why do women need time to think about things?

KillerKat

By KillerKat,
in Huddle Lounge

Recommended Posts

boo7382 Rookie

boo7382

Posted
Posted

So quote every post and let us know this juicy gossip.

aw man cmon that would take a lot of time Im way too lazy for that

"Time to think," means they already know the answer, and they know you won't like it.

They hope time (and distance) will soften the blow, or give you the chance to change your mind.

this...is actually pretty accurate. about half the time, this is the reason

Link to comment
Share on other sites
boo7382 Rookie

boo7382

Posted
Posted

Sounds about right; I understand women...half the time.

So what's the other half?

the other half is we actually DO need time so we can turn around and tell our girlfriends everything and ask them what they think we should do.

hypothetical situation: a guy that your friend used to hook up with like 2 years ago is now trying to get with you. he is someone you have known for a long time and you are the one that introduced the friend to him.

said friend has a boyfriend now and is perfectly happy in her relationship that she has been in for at least 6 months.

You and the guy meet up for drinks and he tries to make a move. you tell him you need to "think about it" before anything happens (if it does happen).

aka, you need to turn around and ask all of your gfs what they think about the situation and what you should do. then, based on how you feel combined with their opinions, you let him know whatsup.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • ForJimmy
      Panthers attempted to trade up with Ravens?

      By ForJimmy · Posted

      Miller being less raw and more pro ready makes sense of why they picked him. With us having a capable starter in Walker the lower floor higher ceiling player makes sense for us as well. I agree with that. 
    • tukafan21
      Panthers attempted to trade up with Ravens?

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      I'm from Michigan and have had this discussion with my Lions friends, and they all agree with me, they were never going to take Freeling over Miller.  As, yes, you are correct, they could have left Sewell at RT and taken Freeling, but they are in a SB contention window right now. An OL with Freeling at LT and Sewell at RT is not as strong as Sewell at LT and Miller at RT would be for this upcoming season and likely at least next year as well. 5 years it could be looked back upon as a long term "mistake" to take Miller over Freeling, but for a franchise like the Lions, you can't worry about the long term when you have current SB aspirations.  It's all about maximizing their current SB window over the next 1-3 years. And it's not about style, it's about day 1 readiness, and a lot of "experts" aren't even sure if Freeling is ready to play Week 1 yet at the position he's used to, let alone switching to a side he hasn't played before, but a career starting RT is going to be more than ready to fill that role for them Week 1. I'm 100% convinced that if our draft positioning was swapped, we'd have still taken Freeling, they'd have still taken Miller, and both teams would have got the OT that they preferred due to what each team needs right now and what their current realistic aspirations are for the 2026 season. We're in a position where we can let our drafted OT sit and learn for a bit, they needed a week 1 starter, for me that's where this discussion becomes very easy to understand why each team took the player they did.
    • TD alt
      Monroe Freeling’s lovely GF

      By TD alt · Posted

      He was also apparently.
×
×
  • Create New...