Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Like it or not, Clausen isnt the reason.


chknwing

Recommended Posts

Do you expect a defense to somehow play good when they're on the field the entire game due to a completely inept offense led by a quarterback who has no business starting in the NFL? They're probably dead tired by the end of the 1st quarter alone.

I could get behind this if it weren't for the fact that the defense has given up huge plays often on their first series. They did it yesterday, and I'm sure they've done it in many more games.

Hell, the game against Chicago comes to mind.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe if carolina could actually execute their gameplan, clausen may perform better but they cant when the defense has you down by 21 points by half time. by that time,u have to revert to all passing and since our Oline has allowed 41 dam sacks, clausen doesnt stand a chance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What motivation does a defense have to stop the other team when the offense can't score points? You know it has to be on their minds.

Professional pride? The pay cheque they bank every week? To impress the new coach?

There's three motivations for you right there

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I could get behind this if it weren't for the fact that the defense has given up huge plays often on their first series. They did it yesterday, and I'm sure they've done it in many more games.

Hell, the game against Chicago comes to mind.

you mean when the D took the field the first series and Atlanta's first snap was already in the redzone?

The D did their job against Chicago. In fact, David Carr might could have won that game for us. I mean to lose that game speaks volumes of how bad Clausen is. The D had 4 picks and that game was a perfect scenario for a QB.

D has a big weakness.....and they have done overall a good job working around it. An offense that can't do squat makes it much worse though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe if carolina could actually execute their gameplan, clausen may perform better but they cant when the defense has you down by 21 points by half time. by that time,u have to revert to all passing and since our Oline has allowed 41 dam sacks, clausen doesnt stand a chance.

Clausen is the one who can't execute the gameplans (checkdowns, scrambles, throwaways, not targeting Smitty).

that was the first time Clausen was put in that big of a hole. Last week the run game gave him a lead at half. Clausen doesn't stand a chance regardless......he has been put in EVERY SCENARIO and the only thing consistant is his horrible play regardless.

Give him a lead

Give him a run game

Give him time

Give him good D play

....he has gotten it all at times but he just sucks. He plays no differently when things work well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Clausen is the one who can't execute the gameplans.

that was the first time Clausen was put in that big of a hole. Last week the run game gave him a lead at half. Clausen doesn't stand a chance regardless......he has been put in EVERY SCENARIO and the only thing consistant is his horrible play regardless.

Give him a lead

Give him a run game

Give him time

Give him good D play

....he has gotten it all at times but he just sucks. He plays no differently when things work well.

Name a QB who has for us this season...

Even the heralded Matt Moore looked like utter poo with our gameplan/OL play...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Clausen is the one who can't execute the gameplans.

that was the first time Clausen was put in that big of a hole. Last week the run game gave him a lead at half. Clausen doesn't stand a chance regardless......he has been put in EVERY SCENARIO and the only thing consistant is his horrible play regardless.

Give him a lead

Give him a run game

Give him time

Give him good D play

....he has gotten it all at times but he just sucks. He plays no differently when things work well.

Ahahaha!

You've got to be joking, right? Dude is hit every other time he drops back to pass.

As for giving him the lead? Is that the Seattle game? Where we gave up 17 unanswered points in about 30 seconds?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Name a QB who has for us this season...

Even the heralded Matt Moore looked like utter poo with our gameplan/OL play...

the old Matt Moore defense......

Matt Moore did in 1 start at least. Great job against SF. Matt Moore didn't make the right throws and flat missed some easy big plays in his other starts. Moore didn't play well and crap OL play had nothing to do w/ some of his horrible throws. Any Panther QB has had to work under shitty playcalling etc. in recent years. That is what it is. Jimmy isn't facing anything significantly different than Jake or Moore.

Jimmy Clausen is just pure garbage. Moore played like garbage in 3 starts .....the rest of his career showed real promise. That is the difference between the 2. One had good/bad and the other bad/bad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Give me Mitchell Evans over T Sanders in this run heavy offense any day of the week. 
    • What's up gents, the OGs remember me, the guy who single-handedly gave the Panthers the greatest uniform in history moniker. Not too long after that I got involved with Pro Football Focus (pre-Collinsworth acquisition) and ended up taking backseat here to preserve some objectivity. But from a distance I noticed a lot. After the end of the Cam era this place devolved into the most un-fun, petty, negative cesspool of whining and bitching that has ever graced the internet. The worst part of it all is that the level of discussion turned into the most ill-informed, hot-take, unnuanced crap, rife with people talking out of their posteriors as if they have any clue about what they are watching. Once you get into the professional side of the sport and actual film rooms, you start to understand there's an absurd number of moving parts to pretty much every snap and the details you are privy to are truly only half the picture. The absolute most important thing I learned from being part of professional level football analysis is that quarterbacking is literally the most intricate and difficult position in all of professional sports, and that the NFL itself is struggling to develop any workable model that allows them to understand what makes one succeed vs what makes one fail. Because of this paradox it has also made the quarterback position itself grossly overvalued from a fan and media standpoint, creating an absurd fixation on the results delivered by a single player who has to rely on the contributions of everyone around them. This also drives the dreaded inflation of QB salaries that inevitably cause even elite teams to lose key talent all to pour cash into the one player supposed to be able to single-handedly elevate the entire team (and defense and special teams and coaching and ownership by some mysterious proxy), yet without those same players even talented teams can wander the wilderness searching for the right guy to take advantage of their talent window. The discussions the last few years around Bryce has personified this insanity, as this board has devolved into some sort of electronic civil war between the hyperbolic Young supporters and the vitriolic Bryce haters. The reality, like practically everything in this world, is somewhere in the middle. He has traits that can absolutely elevate a team with creativity, play recognition, off-arm angle throws, mental toughness, etc. He's also physically limited, with mostly "good-enough" qualities for most situations that a professional quarterback is asked to do, and will never be an overpowering physical force like pre-injury Cam. But "good-enough" physicality represents a large majority of championship-winning quarterbacks, even in the modern era. There's a reason the corpse of Peyton Manning took the chip from elite physical specimen Cam, because the team surrounding him was talented enough to get him there, while we all know Cam was the driving force of that 2015 team. That's no knock on him, that's just how the game of football tends to work: the more complete team usually wins. The summary is this: if this team lives or dies solely on the performance of its quarterback, then it is absolutely a paper tiger even if he plays brilliantly week in and out. There are no superheroes in this sport, there are only conduits that proxy the collective efforts of much of the team around them. And no one alive can tell you how the position is played perfectly, it's all a confluence of circumstance and what unique collection of traits each player brings to the position, which can never be truly recreated season after season, even for the same player on the same team. If this place remains a raging hellscape of idiotic hot takes I will happily remove myself again and do something more productive for yet another decade, but maybe's there hope that we can all get back to the old adage, and keep pounding.
    • Really impressed how the bottom six have looked the past couple games
×
×
  • Create New...