Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Universal whine about Clausen thread


Udogg

Recommended Posts

Sorry let me make it simple

Greg Hardy=Lots of Promise

Charles Johnson=11.5 Sacks

also

Inside push up the middle=0

QB steps up due to no middle presence=completion

We have been able to put pressure on QB's this year but without a true stud DT we can't finish that pressure as you would say. Watch the TB games or tonights game, plenty of times Freeman and Big Ben would feel the heat but all they had to do was step up and the DE's would be out of it.

didnt i say that your complete d-line sucks? ;)

sorry, when i looked up, johnson had 9.5 sacks...now he should have 11.5. i dont know how fast they are on espn...

ok, but u still have a major need on DT...and you wont cover BOTH of them with FA, especially with a deep DT-class...unless you switch to 3-4, but that could be even more complicated for you, couldnt it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

didnt i say that your complete d-line sucks? ;)

sorry, when i looked up, johnson had 9.5 sacks...now he should have 11.5. i dont know how fast they are on espn...

ok, but u still have a major need on DT...and you wont cover BOTH of them with FA, especially with a deep DT-class...unless you switch to 3-4, but that could be even more complicated for you, couldnt it?

Brown would fit perfectly in a 3-4, he's too small for the 4-3 in my view.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

didnt i say that your complete d-line sucks? ;)

sorry, when i looked up, johnson had 9.5 sacks...now he should have 11.5. i dont know how fast they are on espn...

ok, but u still have a major need on DT...and you wont cover BOTH of them with FA, especially with a deep DT-class...unless you switch to 3-4, but that could be even more complicated for you, couldnt it?

Oh I agree with you about DT .My whole point is that I don't think Carolina is gonna trade out to fix the Dline if Luck is on the board. Also with all honesty if Luck isn't in this draft, trading out will probably be damn near impossible

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i am not questioning Clausen's touchdowns, i am just saying that looking down a reciever in a rookie year is a rookie mistake that every QB makes.

But it wasn't a receiver, it was a tight end in a 3 WR set. That is just bad QB play, rookie or not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh I agree with you about DT .My whole point is that I don't think Carolina is gonna trade out to fix the Dline if Luck is on the board. Also with all honesty if Luck isn't in this draft, trading out will probably be damn near impossible

i agree, cant see them trading out, it's hard enough as it is even with Luck to trade down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Bruschi was dead on with the potential aspect. He literally has not improved anything in his game since he first went under center. It's too easy to point out things he's doing wrong in a given game, but the fact that he can't seem to fix any errors throughout the season tells something, he's simply not ready to be a starting QB for us or in the NFL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

if Luck doesn't declare, which I dont think he will, I think Clausen will continue to develop...if you look statistically, this season mirrors the start of his ND career...bring in AJ Green or a top flight free agent WR, and I think you will see more development...the o-line is terrible, and tons of passes are being dropped...while he hasnt developed as he probably should have, you cannot give up on a rookie after one year, especially when a coaching change is about to be made

http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/player/gamelog?playerId=231813&year=2007

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i would take Luck first overall, i would avoid Newton first overall, too risky, rather gamble on Jake Locker (who would've been a high pick if he came out last year), Luck though is who they will and should get if he comes out.

You think Newton is a bigger gamble than Locker? :( Ok I UNDERSTAND now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another one of those things that sucks to hear but is probably true. He truly does look clueless most of the time.

I'm not sure about zero potential either - but he certainly hasn't shown much and he's definitely shown that he's (at the VERY least) not ready to be a starter in this league.

Do they do hand-augmentations yet? Maybe he just needs to go up a palm size...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Call me crazy but if you’re in the bottom 7 in efficiency using Zone 84% of the time why not try something else? You paid Jaycee top 5 CB money use him more effectively. Zone is only efficient if you can generate a good pass rush to force a QB into mistakes otherwise you will get picked apart
    • Good Lord this board has become a cesspool of negativity and where fandom becomes something twisted and unrecognizable.  
    • Yeah, I could jump right into the unbelievable Bryce debate now that some people are trying to flip the script because Bryce Young has, at most, a handful of decent games as a pro, but that's going to work itself out. Suffice it to say that I've seen better QBs (with an s) in a Panthers uniform, and I've certainly seen better QBs be drafted while we're playing around with Bryce, one of them who beat the crap out of us already this season... Let's forget about Bryce (and his markedly underwhelming play since he's been here); I think that most sane fans will agree that drafting him was an error, but it happens. Sure, it doesn't happen to the tune of King's ransom---including your main receiver---but it happens. You bet, you lose. Speaking of receivers...and betting and losing... Oh, man, we drafted Xavier Legette. Yes, just like with Bryce, I've entered "the dark side." Some Huddlers were telling us from the beginning, and they were right. But, I'm not apologizing for waiting to see what a guy's got before making my decision on him. X was a one-year wonder at South Carolina who parlayed some really nice production that season, a great personality and thick country accent, into becoming a first round pick (but only in Carolina). For Dan Morgan and company, He was a big swing that has turned into a big whiff (and I can still feel the ill breeze from that one). Sh¡t happens, right? Well, not so fast. Ladd McConkey was the decidedly more polished receiver who was literally ready to hit the ground running as soon as stepping onto the field as a pro. Ladd was never the biggest guy (though not the smallest), but he was the guy that could run routes, always seemed to get open---no question---and had the same speed as X, but with legit quickness and nuanced shake and bake. But Dan chose the project. He chose the guy where the game speed looks more like a tractor trailer than a 5.0 mustang. Look, I've supported X (just like Bryce) many many a day, but no more. Now I'm not saying that I won't root for the guy. Just like with Bryce, he seems like a great kid. But as far as giving excuses for the kid, and, perhaps more importantly, waiting for some miraculous breakout, I'm done with that. I've seen enough. You don't draft a project for a project. And yes, Bryce had proven to be a project after his first season. In my mind, drafting a supposedly number one receiver that needs lots of development for a starting quarterback that needs immediate help to try and further his development is not going to lead to good things. Pick the surest guy. Or at least pick the one who appears to be the surest guy, because picking can be tricky... especially when you're too busy tricking yourself. 
×
×
  • Create New...