Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Say Denver snags Harbaugh... (Luck scenario)


Darth Urious

Recommended Posts

Hey Panther fans.......

its kinda scary how much this board sounds like Bronco boards.....guess losing does that to ya.:cool:

Anyway, I posted in another thread about Elways infatuation with Luck. He loves the guy, and its not hard to see why.

But there are no guarantees in draft picks.

You guys are in quite a spot. If Luck is available, you have your first but no second.

Alot of needs as we do as well.

One thing I can tell you about The Golden Calf of Bristol....he is the number one redzone threat in the league bar none. Even if he didnt pan out hes very valuable. The guy just puts it in the endzone.

Also, many of you may not know it, but McDaniels gave no first team reps to The Golden Calf of Bristol the entire regular season other than plays that were geared for him.

I guess he brought that here from NE. Tom Brady will not give a single rep to a backup QB.

Orton got all of them here. Remember when we had Chris Simms last year? Orton got hurt, Simms came in, and I thought...wow......this guy is the worst QB Ive seen in 20 years..........not knowing that McD wasnt giving any reps to the backups.

Watching The Golden Calf of Bristol play considering all that is pretty eye opening.

Back to Luck........Elway loves him. Elway is a Stanford man. Elway is very persuasive. If Harbaugh comes to Denver, they may very well be targeting Luck.

Theres only one thing you need to be afraid of: If Luck says he doesnt want to play in Carolina.

What would you guys think of drafting Luck then?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey Panther fans.......

its kinda scary how much this board sounds like Bronco boards.....guess losing does that to ya.:cool:

Anyway, I posted in another thread about Elways infatuation with Luck. He loves the guy, and its not hard to see why.

But there are no guarantees in draft picks.

You guys are in quite a spot. If Luck is available, you have your first but no second.

Alot of needs as we do as well.

One thing I can tell you about The Golden Calf of Bristol....he is the number one redzone threat in the league bar none. Even if he didnt pan out hes very valuable. The guy just puts it in the endzone.

Also, many of you may not know it, but McDaniels gave no first team reps to The Golden Calf of Bristol the entire regular season other than plays that were geared for him.

I guess he brought that here from NE. Tom Brady will not give a single rep to a backup QB.

Orton got all of them here. Remember when we had Chris Simms last year? Orton got hurt, Simms came in, and I thought...wow......this guy is the worst QB Ive seen in 20 years..........not knowing that McD wasnt giving any reps to the backups.

Watching The Golden Calf of Bristol play considering all that is pretty eye opening.

Back to Luck........Elway loves him. Elway is a Stanford man. Elway is very persuasive. If Harbaugh comes to Denver, they may very well be targeting Luck.

Theres only one thing you need to be afraid of: If Luck says he doesnt want to play in Carolina.

What would you guys think of drafting Luck then?

Draft him anyways, just as SD did with Eli.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Draft him anyways, just as SD did with Eli.

No doubt.

In the 2004 Eli Manning trade, San Diego got Rivers, 2004 pick 3.02, their 2005 first and third.

That was to go from first to fourth.

If you guys traded with us, I wonder if you take Cam Newton, move down more, or go DaQuan Bowers or Fairley.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dude I went over to Broncos forum and 80% of the fan base doesn't want Luck - they feel they've already got their QB and defense is higher priority. So Denver can have Harbaugh but you can't have Luck! :prrr:

No worries. We need defense in Denver.

The Golden Calf of Bristol has already shown he can move the offense with little experience.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • We've got another viral Panthers song The dab is back Jags Week 1, Ohio State National Title, JLo got divorced...   Nature is healing, it's Super Bowl time
    • Its too late for that.  Time has run out.  You dont give him a ext if he plays "decent".  He played "decent" at the end of last year and look what happened.  
    • I’m not necessarily advocating sticking with Bryce. His highs show the ability is there, but there’s enough bad film out there to doubt that he can consistently enough play at a high enough level. But this video from Brett Kollman is a pretty good argument to give it a bit more time, whether that be rolling with Bryce just next year or picking up his 5th year option (not extending him).      The gist is that the structural (wider hashes) and rule (3 yd vs 1 yd thresholds for intelligible offensive lineman downfield penalties) differences in the college and NFL have led to wildly different play calling and scheme diets in college. There is much more shotgun and RPO calls in college and screen/quick throws. This simply doesn’t set up young QBs to be able to play under center, which is more preferred in the NFL due to RBs being able to more effectively run out of that formation.  They don’t know how to do it and have to learn. Yes, the NFL has trended more toward college style offense in the last decade or so, but it isn’t that pronounced and is more out of necessity than desire. And on top of all that, they ask the young QBs to do all this learning with coaching and other personnel churn going on around them.  Bad results lead to coaches getting fired and new ones with different ideas on scheme and footwork and different terminology and playbooks coming in. It makes it harder on those young QBs to learn.     So we may drop Bryce for a young QB starter in the draft and be in a similar situation. With a QB who is going to take years to learn how to operate in an NFL style offense and will struggle along the way.  So you have to weigh whether the struggles we see from Bryce are more due to this learning process vs solely physical limitations on his part. It’s almost undoubtedly a bit of both, but the answer to that question I think dictates your strategy at QB over the next few years. And of course, you have to consider what the alternatives available are.    I’m neither a Bryce hater or a Bryce Stan and I don’t have an answer to that question. But I do fear that if we move on from him, unless it’s for an established player, we’re just in for continued frustration on the QB front because it’s going to take a few years for a college QB to develop (Drake Maye’s don’t grow on trees). 
×
×
  • Create New...