Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

A.J. Green thread


Lumps

Recommended Posts

That is the lowest time Green ran but they don't get their lowest time check NFL DRAFT SCOUT for your facts.

You don't have to believe the reports but some say Broyles and Blackmon can bench 300lbs.

Please give me some stats for Green because he does not hold one single stat over Blackmon which includes Blackmon's Biletnikoff Award.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is the lowest time Green ran but they don't get their lowest time check NFL DRAFT SCOUT for your facts.

You don't have to believe the reports but some say Broyles and Blackmon can bench 300lbs.

Please give me some stats for Green because he does not hold one single stat over Blackmon which includes Blackmon's Biletnikoff Award.

Stats from a pass happy Big 12 team..

:lol:

And you wanna talk about facts..

And what's Blackmon's lowest time? Somewhere in the 4.4 area I'd assume?

We'd be the laughing stock of the league if we took Blackmon over Green.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who the hell cares about 40 times? They're both studs and future no. 1 receivers

Valid point.

So who do you take?

The Randy Moss comparison, best prospect in years with talent and potential that oozes over anything it touches and no character issues..

Or one of this year's standard top WR prospects with a DUI on his record..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just don't think anyone deserves to be selected #1 overall in this draft, the closest would be Patrick Peterson or Nick Fairley in my opinion.

Many draft sites have Green, Fairley, Bowers, and Peterson in the same "range" as far as rankings go. I don't particularly think any of those players screams #1, but we're probably going to end up with one of them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm just so angry that the NFL is only allowing teams to get a QB by drafting one this year! :mad:

:rolleyes:

Allow me to make a prediction. IF we get a FA QB, then he'll be a low talent nobody who is willing to play for cheap, and can't can't hit the broad side of a barn. I look forward to revisting this post in the future. Draft Cam.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Valid point.

So who do you take?

The Randy Moss comparison, best prospect in years with talent and potential that oozes over anything it touches and no character issues..

Or one of this year's standard top WR prospects with a DUI on his record..

Well, I don't care about the DUI since poo happens, but if the Panthers were actually able to find a trade partner to move down in the draft, I'd take Green if available. If he weren't there I'd hope the team moved back into the first round somehow with the picks acquired to get Blackmon. I just personally wouldn't take a WR number overall but I'm not going to cry if it happens because Green is that deal.

I'm sure Green is the top prospect on most teams boards, and with good reason seeing as he's a legitimate number one. But there are plenty of examples of players drafted later in the first round who turn out just as productive as the top guys, so if this team acquired Blackmon I'd be fully confident that we would have a number one reciever of our own. The system he plays in is a question, it if you look at the game film, Justin Blackmon is a stud.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Allow me to make a prediction. IF we get a FA QB, then he'll be a low talent nobody who is willing to play for cheap, and can't can't hit the broad side of a barn. I look forward to revisting this post in the future. Draft Cam.

It's all about the route the FO chooses to take.

Trading for a QB is becoming a more and more viable option.

Drafting Green makes Smitty look like some intriguing trade bait.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's all about the route the FO chooses to take.

Trading for a QB is becoming a more and more viable option.

Drafting Green makes Smitty look like some intriguing trade bait.

If I thought for one second that JR was willing to make a major move to get a very good vet QB to lead this team, then I'd be all over drafting Green. I'll fall out of my computer chair if JR makes that move.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Big opportunity for Nadeau if he gets called up. 
    • I think OL is a pretty low overall concern but every single offseason there should be an attempt to upgrade through the draft. Edge rusher there are no easy answers, IMO. If a truly elite prospect falls to us in the 1st, that is fine. This draft seems to be much more heavy on 3-4 DE's or 4-3 DE's than it is on elite EDGE guys. You just have to keep plugging away every offseason and hope it works out. I don't think it's worth trading a ton of draft capital over at the moment, despite being a crucial roster weakness. Do the best you can and build a better roster and maybe eventually we will be in a position to be making a Parsons level trade.
    • I understand that a capable OC is desirable but I also understand, or think I might, the dynamics with the staff and maybe I’m wrong but I do not see Canales firing his offensive right hand guy without significant pressure from Morgan or Tepper to do so.  So that, in addition to Canales stating pretty definitively, that he was keeping play calling.     I don’t know what you do in that circumstance. It would need to be important enough to you to make it worth firing Canales to get your OC play caller.    To that, if Canales not being good so far at play calling (and we only have the one year in TB to factor with what we have see here), is accepted as a given, it is only fair and honest to consider what an impediment having to construct and administer an offense around Bryce Young’s game would be to an OC. I would say it is a big complication, big surprise there.  You won’t know about Canales 100% until you remove Bryce from the equation and get him a clean slate to create from - without the Bryce restrictions.  And yeah you will likely end up without a top notch high flying offense. But it still *could* be much better than it is now. In the right hands.  So that is potentially what we’re looking at. I suppose we could keep Bryce and bring in a college style coach and design a Bryce rollout offense or something and see if that helped. I am not in favor of that, probably the last thing I would want.  We could do nothing, which I am not in favor of. We could fire Canales and keep Bryce (my least preferred option). We could get rid of both, which I would begrudgingly accept but would lament the interruption of the continuity that a 3rd year would provide.  You could get rid of Bryce and get a couple of new QB prospects in here, vets, drafts, whatever… that would be my choice.  I am afraid I know how it’s gonna go. All I can really say about that is, there has not been a single time in three years that I looked at the upcoming game and felt like we were gonna win because we have Bryce Young playing QB. Because of what he could do with the ball in his hands. Not once. Sure there have been a handful of games that he was part of the reason we won, a couple he was a big part, but not enough times to feel like that is my expectation. At best, it is cross your fingers and hope for good Bryce. 
×
×
  • Create New...