Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Ron Rivera now reportedly the leading candidate for the HC job


Dpantherman

Recommended Posts

Now I know that our coaching staff will not 100% look like this but I can guarantee that at least 3-7 of those coaches will be on our coaching staff.

You can't even guarantee that Rivera will be here. How can you say that any of those assistants will be here. Slight overreaction if you ask me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can't even guarantee that Rivera will be here. How can you say that any of those assistants will be here. Slight overreaction if you ask me.

I mean if Rivera is here. The only reason I am saying this is because every where he has gone he has had the tendancy to bring at least one of his buddies with him and considering that the Panthers have vacancies at every position you can almost guarantee it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Braylon Edwards was never a Bronco, I think you mean Brandon Marshall. Also he wouldn't have control over personnel if he was offensive coordinator so he couldn't trade our superstars away. If you look at his offenses when he was at the Patriots, the record setting 2007 season and what he did with Matt Cassel in 2008, and even what he did with Kyle Orton in Denver its obvious the guy knows how to run an offense and develop a quarterback both of what we need dearly.

How has the Patriot offense been before and after McDaniles?

Crennel, Mangini, McDaniels, Weiss. You really want these failures away from the Patriot Machine/Bill Belichek calling the shots for the Panthers?

Who's the Patriots OC this year? Don't Google it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

HC: Rivera

DC: Ryan

OC: McDaniels

LB: Singletary

honestly i'd like the new coach to bring back Richard Smith as LB coach (if that is indeed who the LB coach has been, had to check the site). he's done an excellent job progressing several kids into outstanding LBs.

EDIT: I see he's only been the coach since 2009. still decent, though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I mean if Rivera is here. The only reason I am saying this is because every where he has gone he has had the tendancy to bring at least one of his buddies with him and considering that the Panthers have vacancies at every position you can almost guarantee it.

I get ya. Just clearing things up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You would really have to sell these coaches on the commitment to winning and their own job security along with adjusting some contracts as far as money concers due to many of these coaches capabilites to be very good coaches. Now I wouldn't call it a demotion I would call it more of an oppurtunity to be great. Now the only reason I don't call it a demotion is because those particular coaching positions aren't as important so to speak as the head coach, offensive coach defenisve coaching job is.

Now I know that our coaching staff will not 100% look like this but I can guarantee that at least 3-7 of those coaches will be on our coaching staff.

I should've just left it at "this is 100% unrealistic" and not really argued with you. I posted a realistic group of assistants in this thread and most all of them are both available and the type guys we'd hire.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I should've just left it at "this is 100% unrealistic" and not really argued with you. I posted a realistic group of assistants in this thread and most all of them are both available and the type guys we'd hire.

You don't just hire guys that the coach is unfamiliar with. Rivera will get to choose his staff and he will not choose guys he is unfamiliar with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You don't just hire guys that the coach is unfamiliar with. Rivera will get to choose his staff and he will not choose guys he is unfamiliar with.

he doesn't just get to go outside and shout it to make it happen. Teams have to allow those coaches to leave. Hint: they won't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In my opinion Fitterer was probably right about not paying McCaffrey. Now not wanting to "pay RBs" in my opinion isn't something you want to set in stone, to me it all comes down to the individual.
    • Maybe I'm just not understanding, but everywhere that I have read says that signing bonuses go against the cap prorated by as much as five years. The following example uses Andrew Luck's rookie contract as an example. "Take Andrew Luck, the first overall pick in the 2012 NFL draft. Luck signed a four-year contract with the Colts worth $22.1 million and included a $14.5 million signing bonus. Rather than a $14.5 million cap hit in 2012, the Colts spread out his signing bonus over the life of his contract. The hit against the cap would be $3.625 million per year over four years instead of a direct cap hit of $14.5 million directly in 2012. This gave the Colts more leverage and cap flexibility in signing other players." https://www.the33rdteam.com/nfl-signing-bonuses-explained/ I don't know why some of you think that signing bonuses aren't counted against the cap over the length of the contract, but whatever.   "The bonus with a signing is usually the most garish aspect of a rookie contract. Bonus is the immediate cash players receive when they ink a deal. It factors into the cap, but only for the whole contract duration, in terms of salary cap calculations. In the case of Bryce Young’s $24.6 million signing bonus, that’s prorated to approximately $6.15 million per season over a four-year deal. This format allows teams to handle the cap and provides rookies with some short-term fiscal stability, which is important given the high injury risk in this league." https://collegefootballnetwork.com/how-rookie-contracts-work-in-the-nfl/ I understand how signing bonuses can be a useful tool in order to manage the cap, and as one of the article suggests, signing bonuses may become important if you have a tight cap, but the bill is always going to come due. I'm not necessarily referring to you Tuka, but it seems to me that others simply don't want to understand that fact which is why they're reacting to what I'm saying negatively. How odd. In any event, I have a better general understanding of why signing bonuses are used now, and it's generally to fit salaries under the cap. Surely players, whether they be rookies or not, love a signing bonus because they get a good portion of their money up front. This in turn gives them more security and probably amounts to tax benefits as well. I also understand why teams would not want to use signing bonuses, particularly for players or draftees who have a higher probability of being gone before a contract even ends.
    • Get any shot you can at humane society, so much cheaper
×
×
  • Create New...