Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Yasinskas chimes in on the Rivera hire and presser


Dpantherman

Recommended Posts

Also on the ESPN Blog:

"It might be time to stop celebrating Tampa Bay’s 10-6 season. The Bucs reportedly have lost special teams coach Rich Bisaccia to the San Diego Chargers.

While losing a special teams coach might not seem like that big of a deal, it is in this case. Bisaccia is one of the league’s best when it comes to coaching special teams and that was an area of strength for the Buccaneers in 2010."

I have no expertise/knowledge in the area, but don't we need a new ST coach?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree, a lot of good stuff here... with our RBs and if the oline can get healthy we don't have to have a great QB... a good game manager will do. Use our first pick on D, have a kick ass D, and run the hell out of the ball and hopefully we can find a good FA QB or develop someone. With Luck out of the mix we need to use our first pick with the best available player and use what we have elsewhere for now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He won't be, he shouldn't be, but he will need to compete for the job. I don't want to go into next year EXPECTING him to improve to a poitn where he is an NFL quarterback. I want that to be an option but for us to have other plans in case it turns out he simply won't be.

right.. I agree with you, and I think he will improve.. especially with a good QB coach, which should be expected to be brought in soon..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

kind of what everyone needs to realize.. Clausen won't be kicked to the curb based on last year, and it's absurd to assume so..

Thank you. I tried my damndest to convince people that Davidson's system was horrible for a rookie QB. Too many slow developing routes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the offensive system was dumbed down as far as one could be and he still couldnt do poo

that's incredibly incorrect..

please read someone who knows what they are talking about:

Thank you. I tried my damndest to convince people that Davidson's system was horrible for a rookie QB. Too many slow developing routes.

thanks man, the less typing I have to do the better.. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When Clausen first came in against the Bengals, there was a comment the offense had been simplified for him after the game if I recall. It was during a presser I thought though and I'm not going to go watch 'em to be sure. It may have been a later game, can't recall, but there is 0 indication it was that way at the end of the season, or that the simplification helped him at all, considering the routes our WRs were running.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When Clausen first came in against the Bengals, there was a comment the offense had been simplified for him after the game if I recall. It was during a presser I thought though and I'm not going to go watch 'em to be sure. It may have been a later game, can't recall, but there is 0 indication it was that way at the end of the season, or that the simplification helped him at all, considering the routes our WRs were running.

Completely irrespective of who the QB was...I'm horrified that our already stupidly simple offense could have been simplified anymore at all. I mean really?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Completely irrespective of who the QB was...I'm horrified that our already stupidly simple offense could have been simplified anymore at all. I mean really?

I have no idea what was done or how it was done or any of that, so I can't comment on that. I know the comment was made, though, because we actually had a discussion about it here with some people saying "Moore didn't need a simplified offense!!"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have no idea what was done or how it was done or any of that, so I can't comment on that. I know the comment was made, though, because we actually had a discussion about it here with some people saying "Moore didn't need a simplified offense!!"

Matt Moore most definitely ran a simplified offense when he came in as a rookie. Besides that, the running game was clicking as well as ever when he made his first few starts.

The bottom line is that pretty much every team in the NFL has a short passing game now (not just WCO teams), except us. If you watched many of Sam Bradford's games, you know that the vast majority of his throws were 10yds or less, while Clausen was standing back there waiting for deep crossing routes to develop and there were usually only two WR's running routes to begin with.

That is a huge difference for a young QB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am really excited about Rivera, and a couple of things that have been highlighted are the reason

1. Going to establish a primary TE that will help the QB, whoever it ends up being.

2. Aggresive, fundamentally solid defense.

3. Teaching the young players how to play the game properly

4. one of the biggest things I heard, and correct me if I am wrong, but I am fairly certain he mentioned something about using offense aggressively and not just to maintain a small lead.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Rico walking is no big deal. I'll take a healthy 2024 Hubbard over Rico any time and losing Mays is, again, no a big deal.  Young is signed for what, $35M for the next two years? Say he wants $50M but the FO doesn't. If they put the franchise tag on him, that would be around $55? So basically they are getting Young for the next 3 years for an average of $30M per year. Putting the franchise tag on him wouldn't be my first choice but it gives them an option that wouldn't be locking him into a long term, $50M contract. I'm not suggestion they do that. Just that the option will be there should they get to that point. Hunt is on a 5 year deal which is done in 28 so he either restructures or is gone anyway. Moton will be 35 by then and will either be gone or have diminished playing time. Neither of those players has anything to do with getting Young a contract. The O line is way overpaid anyway. Hopefully by the time they are gone, Freeling and Hecht will be developed and Ickey will be healthy. Young was benched his second year and only got his job back because Dalton was injured. Not sure how you can call that entitled. And I would NOT say putting a rookie QB on a team with no receivers, tight ends or O lineman and then being put with a coach who never wanted you and is fired mid season, is a definition of luck. As far as competition, no team is going to bring in competition for a QB picked first overall - especially given the capital that was given up to get him.  
    • With apologies to Lady Cowboy fan, any day we can screw over the Cowboys is a GOOD day…
    • Been here since 2014ish. Good times. Its a shame Zod wont sell, it wouldnt take that much effort to get this place back into shape.
×
×
  • Create New...