Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Before Suh, the last DT drafted in top 5 to make a Pro Bowl was Sean Gilbert in '92


Sam Mills Fan

Recommended Posts

People like to talk about the risks of drafting a quarterback, but a defensive tackle being drafted that high presents just as much a risk if not more so.

Here are the defensive tackles drafted in the top 5 since Cortez Kennedy was drafted #3 overall in 1990 and went on to have a Hall of Fame career:

Russell Maryland #1 overall in 1993: Bust

Sean Gilbert #3 overall in 1992: Bust (although at least he made a Pro Bowl one year)

Dan Wilkinson #1 overall in 1994: Bust

Darrell Russell #2 overall in 1997: Bust

Gerard Warren #3 overall in 2001: Bust

Dewayne Robertson #3 overall in 2003: Bust

Glenn Dorsey #5 overall in 2008: Bust

Ndamukong Suh #2 overall in 2010: Not a bust

Gerald McCoy #3 overall in 2010: Too soon to tell, he was just okay this season (and he's the one I keep hearing analysts compare Fairley to)

No one thinks that Fairley is as good as Suh, so why would you draft him a full spot ahead of where Suh went last season? That's incredibly poor value you're getting there. If you are Ron Rivera and Marty Hurney and you want to pick Nick Fairley, PLEASE find a way to trade down so if he busts, at least we could recoup a pick close to our wasted one we traded for Armanti.

In closing, I'm 100% anti-Nick Fairley at #1. He is similar to Peppers in that he takes plays off at times, yet doesn't possess nearly the talent that Peppers had nor the talent Suh has. And history shows that picking defensive tackles that high usually doesn't end well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dorsey played okay this season. Not nearly good enough to warrant a #3 pick overall, especially not when you remember the incredible hype he had coming out of LSU. There were lots of people that thought he was going to go #1 overall that year.

A decent amount of it has to do with him being in a 3-4 defence. Which doesn't play to his best strengths. He's better suited for a 4-3.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • They are not equal. But I didn’t believe either was worth that ridiculously desperate trade up.  I agreed with you then and still believe that now. We got horrible value for those assets.    Half the people here trashed the 2023 offense while overlooking that a coach they don’t think much of went 6-6 with them to finish 2022. You could have built on that.   Think about the picks lost and DJ too, and the additional investment in 2024 and the 1st this year and imagine all that still being done and having Darnold running it.  Then the 9th in 2023, the other 1st and two 2nds, you could have put them into the defense and still have had the massive offensive investment. Granted you would have altered the cap money you had for the guards by paying Darnold.  And tell me we wouldn’t have been so far ahead of where we are now….
    • You got a be living in a cave somewhere to poo this post. Ohhhhh... LOL 
    • I love the Panthers but I bet A LOT on DAL at -3
×
×
  • Create New...