Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Broncos HC search, etc

ladypanther

By ladypanther,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

ladypanther Grand Master

ladypanther

Posted
Posted

http://www.denverpost.com/broncos/ci_17092169?source=pkg

The Broncos' search committee — Ellis, Elway, team owner Pat Bowlen and general manager Brian Xanders — started with a broad list of candidates before choosing eight to be interviewed.

Three declined the offer — Stanford coach Jim Harbaugh, who took the 49ers' head coaching job; Falcons offensive coordinator Mike Mularkey; and Saints defensive coordinator Gregg Williams — while five, including Broncos interim head coach Eric Studesville, were interviewed.

Interesting that Williams and Mularkey were not interested in the Denver job.

Also:

"It was beneficial to have a psychologist/headhunter who had done this kind of search and interview process before, specifically (in) professional sports.

"He was really able to guide all of us, and extract a lot of good information about a candidate's makeup and personal character."

And.....

Fox's responses were partly cloudy — it's clear he didn't want to reveal too much today. But he expressed confidence and singled that he clearly believes he's the man who can pull the Broncos out of the NFL cellar and back to the penthouse. Why else would he have signed a four-year deal for between $3 million and $3.5 million a season after making $6 million as coach of the Carolina Panthers in 2010?

Did they not realize no on else was interested? And, get used to those "cloudy" responses. lol Guess the press has not done their homework

Read more: John Fox ready to start rebuilding Broncos - The Denver Post http://www.denverpost.com/broncos/ci_17098005#ixzz1B4ENhfIp

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • SCO96
      Passer Rating Differential: A Key to predicting a teams playoff and championship potential.

      By SCO96 · Posted

      Passer Rating Differential = Offensive Passer Rating  - Defensive Passer Rating    Offensive Passer Rating = how efficient your team’s QBs are. Defensive Passer Rating Allowed = how efficient opposing QBs are against your defense. The larger the positive differential, the more dominant your team’s passing game is relative to opponents’ passing success. Conversely, a negative differential means your defense is getting carved up or your offense isn’t efficient enough. Almost every Super Bowl champion from the 1970s to the present day finished near the top of the league in DPRD (Defensive Passer Rating Differential). https://coldhardfootballfacts.com/stats/passer-ratings-differential Look at where we are #16 and we have a Negative DPRD (-0.36). Every team above us has a a positive DPRD, is .500 or better, and still in running for a playoff spot.  Look at the chart. The best teams in the NFL have the highest DPRD. Only 2 teams below us with a negative DPRD are still in contention or the playoffs: #19 San Francisco (-4.44) and # 21 Tampa Bay(-6.62). And, Tampa has no shot if they fail to beat us down the stretch at least once. The teams with the highest negative DPRD always seem to be at the bottom of the standings. I didn't learn about this stat until 15 years ago. It's amazing how it always seems to accurately predict who will be in playoff contention year end and year out. 1 = Los Angeles Rams 111.76 85.23 26.53 2 3 Philadelphia Eagles 100.00 75.57 24.43 3 1 Seattle Seahawks 100.30 77.42 22.88 4 1 Buffalo Bills 104.20 82.66 21.54 5 1 Los Angeles Chargers 91.46 71.19 20.27 6 1 Houston Texans 90.70 72.40 18.30 7 1 Detroit Lions 110.41 94.40 16.01 8 1 New England Patriots 109.10 96.75 12.35 9 3 Green Bay Packers 102.95 92.09 10.86 10 1 Denver Broncos 89.21 78.78 10.43 11 1 Indianapolis Colts 95.12 85.91 9.21 12 = Pittsburgh Steelers 97.42 89.90 7.52 13 = Baltimore Ravens 93.87 86.91 6.96 14 2 Jacksonville Jaguars 88.07 81.23 6.84 15 4 Chicago Bears 89.48 88.70 0.78 16 2 Carolina Panthers 88.77 89.13 -0.36 17 2 Arizona Cardinals 93.49 95.79 -2.30 18 1 Kansas City Chiefs 88.85 92.46 -3.61 19 1 San Francisco 49ers 96.87 101.31 -4.44 20 1 Atlanta Falcons 87.50 92.50 -5.00 21 3 Tampa Bay Buccaneers 89.77 96.39 -6.62 22 = Dallas Cowboys 98.69 108.92 -10.23 23 = New York Giants 87.74 98.84 -11.10 24 1 New Orleans Saints 84.97 96.17 -11.20 25 1 Miami Dolphins 88.33 102.37 -14.04 26 3 Minnesota Vikings 75.03 90.31 -15.28 27 3 Las Vegas Raiders 83.50 99.14 -15.64 28 = Cincinnati Bengals 84.51 104.46 -19.95 29 2 Washington Commanders 87.24 107.74 -20.50 30 3 Cleveland Browns 70.46 91.41 -20.95 31 1 New York Jets 77.75 104.86 -27.11 32 = Tennessee Titans 76.27 106.03 -29.76  
    • Donald LaFell
      The Carolina Panthers aren't ass!

      By Donald LaFell · Posted

      Yeah and truthfully I’ll be ok with that as long as the talent and culture is building. 
    • mrcompletely11
      The Carolina Panthers aren't ass!

      By mrcompletely11 · Posted

      We have been on the right side of one score games.  But like minny a few years ago and KC, we know that isnt sustainable and we probably will revert back to the nfl mean.  Which could mean a poo season incoming if this offense doesnt figure poo out
×
×
  • Create New...