Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Jack for Bynum and Blake?

BOBCATS_BALL!

By BOBCATS_BALL!,
in Charlotte Hornets

Recommended Posts

cdandi1 Newbie

cdandi1

Posted
Posted

I don't have a link but I heard on 610 am that this trade was being discussed.

What do you guys think? I would love to have Bynum even if we had to give up our top scorer.

when was this talked about? what exactly was the frame they were talking about? They heard it from sources close the bobcats, nba? Was likely, first stages, fantasy?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
BOBCATS_BALL! Newbie

BOBCATS_BALL!

Posted
  • Author
Posted

when was this talked about? what exactly was the frame they were talking about? They heard it from sources close the bobcats, nba? Was likely, first stages, fantasy?

About an hour or so ago. They didn't give much detail and they also thought it was a bad trade but the guys on the drive said tie trade was being discussed. They also mentioned wallace for odom and arrest but I don't want anything to do with arrest.

I agree with you that giving up wallace for bynum would be sweet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
cdandi1 Newbie

cdandi1

Posted
Posted

As much as I like gerald, his game is being replicated by henderson and derrick brown. G-Force made his money by hustling, playing good -d, fast breaks, etc. Those things are being done by gerald henderson and he is a better leader. Mind you, g-force is a better rebounder, but i can give that up for bynum. bynum would give us the tools to bang with that big boy in orlando.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
BOBCATS_BALL! Newbie

BOBCATS_BALL!

Posted
  • Author
Posted

As much as I like gerald, his game is being replicated by henderson and derrick brown. G-Force made his money by hustling, playing good -d, fast breaks, etc. Those things are being done by gerald henderson and he is a better leader. Mind you, g-force is a better rebounder, but i can give that up for bynum. bynum would give us the tools to bang with that big boy in orlando.

Bynum would give this franchise somehing its never had, a dominant big man.

If we did make this trade, we could take the top scorer available on the draft. I would love to get fredette from byu but he might go earlier than our pick

Link to comment
Share on other sites
cdandi1 Newbie

cdandi1

Posted
Posted

LA has no need for Jackson and they have no depth at Center. No way they trade Bynum. Also Odom and Artest for Wallace makes me lol. Fantasy homer.

But, the only trade asset the lakers have is bynum. Everyone else is too old and locked into unattractive contracts. If the lakers were going to shake up the roster it is more than likely going to involve bynum.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Eazy-E Mentor

Eazy-E

Posted
Posted

But, the only trade asset the lakers have is bynum. Everyone else is too old and locked into unattractive contracts. If the lakers were going to shake up the roster it is more than likely going to involve bynum.

I agree with that but they are going to want a big in return regardless if he is a starter or bench. All LA would have is Pau.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Ruff Newbie

Ruff

Posted
Posted

I seriously wouldn't do it, because of who the trade is for. Jax is the best scoring option on the team, and giving him up for a Center who can't stay healthy, and for an aging PG who has never made it passed Sixth Man... That just doesn't cut it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • strato
      OFFICIAL 2026 Undrafted Free Agent Thread

      By strato · Posted

      Yep. I was hoping for and calling for a day three guy. But I didn’t research the position to say if we should or should‘t have jumped at a particular guy at a particular spot.    And everything I read said it was a poor draft for RBs depth wise. I guess when Seattle takes a backup RB in the 1st, that kind of backs that up.    I definitely think we should keep 4 running backs and if King can play well enough then keep him too.    I believe I heard Canales say we are a running team (talking about drafting a WR he will be needing to block as well as catch). Well if we are gonna be a running team by identity we don’t need to stock the WR room to overflowing. If one room has to sacrifice, it should not be the RB room given our circumstances. 
    • outlaw4
      Dan had a great draft

      By outlaw4 · Posted

      If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
    • 45catfan
      2026 Mock Drafts

      By 45catfan · Posted

      I just saw the funniest thing...or very disappointing, depending how you handle misery. A guy on YouTube did a 2027 'way too early' mock draft.  If I told you the simulator has the Panthers selecting in the top 10 , what would you say?  If I told you it was pick #8 and only two QBs were taken in the top 7, what would you say?  If I told you this dude had us taking a defensive player, what would you say?
×
×
  • Create New...