Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Wilbon on PTI just said...

Jangler

By Jangler,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

D34Williams Newbie

D34Williams

Posted
Posted

he's talking about the replacement players playing instead of the actual players on the 53 man roster. I don't know for sure, but I think it's the practice squad guys that get to go out and play, if indeed there is any playing at all. That's what happened in 1987 when the players went on strike and there was a lockout. It was only for like 3 weeks, and those games ended up counting towards their teams records when it came to the postseason, draft order, etc. I don't know if that is actually going to happen or not, but if it is, this is what they're referring to when they say scrub players.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
mountainpantherfan Newbie

mountainpantherfan

Posted
Posted

The biggest myth right now in the NFL is that the only option for the owners is to force a lockout. That is not the case.

The owners and claim that the negociations have stalled (and the NFLPA is playing right into the owners hands on this one) and present to the Labor board their "last, best offer". At this point in time the NFLPA will have two options, accept the deal or strike.

If they strike, the owners will use replacement players just like they did in 87. It's not about needing to use them to make money off the games being played, it's the fact that America will watch them and thus the use of them will become a negociating weapon in bringing down the NFLPA.

The players never had much of a chance in this. They are placing all of their hopes in that the US court system will defy all past rulings and see the NFL as one corperation and a group of owners. Thats the only way the players will get what they want and those chances are not really likely.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
countryboi Veteran

countryboi

Posted
Posted

The biggest myth right now in the NFL is that the only option for the owners is to force a lockout. That is not the case.

The owners and claim that the negociations have stalled (and the NFLPA is playing right into the owners hands on this one) and present to the Labor board their "last, best offer". At this point in time the NFLPA will have two options, accept the deal or strike.

If they strike, the owners will use replacement players just like they did in 87. It's not about needing to use them to make money off the games being played, it's the fact that America will watch them and thus the use of them will become a negociating weapon in bringing down the NFLPA.

The players never had much of a chance in this. They are placing all of their hopes in that the US court system will defy all past rulings and see the NFL as one corperation and a group of owners. Thats the only way the players will get what they want and those chances are not really likely.

so if the players are fuged why are even doing this?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jangler Newbie

Jangler

Posted
  • Author
Posted

he's talking about the replacement players playing instead of the actual players on the 53 man roster. I don't know for sure, but I think it's the practice squad guys that get to go out and play, if indeed there is any playing at all. That's what happened in 1987 when the players went on strike and there was a lockout. It was only for like 3 weeks, and those games ended up counting towards their teams records when it came to the postseason, draft order, etc. I don't know if that is actually going to happen or not, but if it is, this is what they're referring to when they say scrub players.

The difference this time is the owners are threatening. In '87 it was the players that went on strike. As was stated the owners will get paid with or without football, the players won't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
mountainpantherfan Newbie

mountainpantherfan

Posted
Posted

so if the players are fuged why are even doing this?

There not. They got a great deal under the old CBA. The owners are the ones backing out of the deal and now forcing a new one to be settled on.

The players don't want any changes to the old CBA and would be just as happy to see it stay the same (aside from the fact the old CBA gave the league the right to go to a 18 game regular season, players aren't mentioning that one right now.) The owners are the ones that want changes made. The dumb move was that the NFLPA gave the owners the right to do this in the old CBA. The players were banking on the "fact" that owners would allow an uncapped year in fear of never again having the cap.

The players and the NFLPA took a deal back in 2006 that really set them up come 2011. The owners hold all the cards right now and the players gave them to the owners.

There's not going to be a lockout by the way. Either the owner will make their "best, last offer" or the NFLPA will decertify. Eitherway a lockout will not happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Navy_football
      Why does Bryce get the blame?

      By Navy_football · Posted

      Roger all that. Do you think BY avoided any sacks last game? This oline is not what you're touting them to be. They are much better then 2023! Much much much better than 2023. But come on now, you'd expect this expensive oline (most are run blocking specialist) to at least dominate in the run game every game.  And... I keep telling you our WRs and TEs are not that good yet. I mean last Sunday was a prime example. Our receiving targets never make plays like those. Never. And this is from one of the worst teams in the league. Shough could have easily had 3 INTs if not for his receivers making plays on the ball. Our guys just don't do that. XL almost allowed an INT backing up out of bounds instead of coming to the ball. And everyone would have blamed that on BY. That's why he doesn't throw to that dude. I can't recall a game except maybe the second Falcons game - maybe, where I thought our receivers could possibly be better than the other team's. I think TMac and Coker have a lot of potential. But they're aren't consistent. But they're young and WILL improve. I'm confident of that.  I don't agree that BY was drafted to only stand in the pocket. He has always been best off schedule - for better or worse. 
    • ForJimmy
      Why does Bryce get the blame?

      By ForJimmy · Posted

      Do you think you will get a direct answer?  Icky giving up 5 pressures (playing hurt in his defense) by himself and Bryce only getting sacked once tells you he played well in the pocket.  He extended plays and converted some tough downs.  
    • frankw
      What gets this team past this?

      By frankw · Posted

      I've been very apprehensive about potentially firing yet another head coach. But Canales needs to focus on being a head coach first and foremost and begin handing off some responsibilities like playcalling duties and begin overseeing the entire team or we need to assess all possible ideal HC candidates in the offseason.
×
×
  • Create New...