Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Cat Scratch Reader article about what offense we will run.


eViL jEsTeR

Recommended Posts

http://www.derp/2011/2/5/1975521/so-what-will-the-offense-look-like-in-2011-part-one

I found this part most interesting.

---------------------------------------------

Let's end the suspense before it starts. Presumably, Chud has picked up some things along the way from the offensive coordinators he worked for. In his career, he's worked under Terry Robiski, Cam Cameron, and Clarence Shelmon. All three are advocates of the Coryell offense, and in particular the Norv Turner variant. Coincidentally, Norv Turner is the current head coach of the Chargers, Chud's last team. So if you're wondering, the odds are pretty good that this is what we see in Carolina next year.

And let's get the irony out of the way. Our last Offensive Coordinator was Jeff Davidson, who followed Chud in Cleveland. Chud ran a variation of the Air Coryell offense there, and Davidson went to an Erhardt-Perkins system. Prior to Davidson's tenure, Dan Henning worked the sidelines in Carolina, and he also ran the Air Coryell offense. Davidson came here and again changed it to an Erhardt-Perkins system. And now Chud gets to follow Davidson and put the Coryell system back.

---------------------------------------------

It's a two part article.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The thought of Clausen running an Air Coryell attack doesn't encourage me much. He's way better suited to a West Coast Offense :(

Honestly, of guys that are connected (sort of) to the Panthers right now, the QB with the best skill set is probably...(cue dramatic music)...Matt Moore.

I still think our starter for the coming year will be a vet like Volek though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Scot, look at what Turner did with the Coryell offense in Dallas. There was still the long ball, but a real emphasis on quick short and mid-range passes based on timing. I probably could have put more in there on that, but my fingers were tired...

I figure if Clausen is the starter, they'll adapt to his particular strengths and weaknesses. If we can't threaten downfield though, we'll be limited in both run and pass. Definitely not Clausen's strong suit.

Again though, I'm not especially convinced that Clausen will be the starter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think limiting the new staff by assuming they can't/won't devise an offense according to our players and not the other way is a mistake. The past here is not a clear indication of the future.

Not sure what you mean by that? Are you suggesting we're looking at another offensive system?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I figure if Clausen is the starter, they'll adapt to his particular strengths and weaknesses. If we can't threaten downfield though, we'll be limited in both run and pass. Definitely not Clausen's strong suit.

Again though, I'm not especially convinced that Clausen will be the starter.

Yeah, I was thinking that. Then I started looking at who else is out there, and the odds we get them. Frankly, I'm not sold that Clausen would get beat out in Training Camp by Billy Volek. But when I say that, I'm assuming he makes a decent improvement from his rookie year.

Worst case would be a year two Jimmy, though, which just about has to be better than year one. And our quarterback doesn't have to air it out deep constantly, just enough to remind the defense that he's willing to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...