Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Guitar Hero cancelled


88 Bronco

Recommended Posts

Typical Activision, honestly. The first game or two were awesome, different, and fun. Then they had to release 1-3 a year and people got bored of them. Should have spaced them out a couple years between.

They are doing the same thing to the CoD franchise, not surprisingly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wait....

Are you telling me that because I can play Through the Fire and the Flame on expert that I cant actually play guitar?

I can't tell if you're being sarcastic or not (I think you are, though), but, if not, I am pretty sure you picked up a real guitar before you picked up the plastic one with buttons...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've always found this game frustrating. When playing at other people's houses, I always hated the delay. It struck me as stupid that you can't play the note at the right time, you have to play the note a split second before the right time.

I've been told you can adjust these settings in the game menu but I can't believe everywhere I've played it had it calibrated wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Typical Activision, honestly. The first game or two were awesome, different, and fun. Then they had to release 1-3 a year and people got bored of them. Should have spaced them out a couple years between.

They are doing the same thing to the CoD franchise, not surprisingly.

And making a fug load of money in the process.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the last one was the best, imo. letting you import songs from all the newer games was awesome.

too bad they screwed up the online/multiplayer.

oh, on a sorta related note, powergig:rise of the sixstring is the most aweful game that ive ever played. the "real guitar" concept seemed cool, but they totally released the most god aweful game possible, with no online mode at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Teams do some super stupid stuff with mid-fairly good QBs. I think they are just absolutely terrified they will be stuck with a QB that is not the quality of the QB they have now, even if its someone like Daniel Jones. Lots of trash QBs go in the first round. I encourage you to take a look at the sad, sad list of first round QBs in the last 15 years.  
    • No, it will be a raw 6'7" 17-year-old European who just played basketball for the first time in March and who the idiot GM "had first on our board." He'll play the whole G-League season, get in 42 games for the Hornets and average 1.1 ppg on 35% shooting. Been there, seen that.
    • We missed on Burns at his peak value. That’s the problem with trading for picks 2-3 years away (which people were convinced the Rams would suck by now and these would be higher picks btw). Each year away the pick is the further in value it drops. Fitt was clearly hired based on turning us around quickly. It’s one of the many reasons tanking isn’t really a thing as our player JJ is telling you in this original article. It would take the whole organization from the owners down admitting they aren’t winning soon with Burns and picks 2-3 years away having more value because that’s when we are still rebuilding. It would only make sense if Fitt had a longer leash and would more than likely be the ones making these picks anyway which you wouldn’t want. The question is would you rather have those Rams picks with the strong possibility of Fitt still being here or would you rather Fitt try to “win now” like he did and expedite his firing? Altering the timeline would affect more than just the Rams picks. 
×
×
  • Create New...