Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Official 2025 NHL Playoffs Thread


Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Day1PanthersFan said:

Yeah, let's be excited to face the team and goalie who owned us the last time

I will quote all your bs "Bob isn't that good this year" posts if we are down 0-3 in game 1

I'm sure you will because you are a whiny pessamist of a fan who posts 90% negative.

Heck it will be 0-0 after 1 and you will be acting like its the end of the world lol.

I guarantee you we won't be down 3-0 at any point in game one....

 

 

This is the ECF there are no EASY OUTS to be the best you got to beat the best.

 

Yep they did a number on our complete depleted team two years ago and managed 4 one goal victories....

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Day1PanthersFan said:

Yeah, let's be excited to face the defending champs, with the best playoff goaltender of this generation 

 

Funny edit and no that's still Vassi.... lets also ignore the fact hes been a .900 and 2.8 gaa goalie this POST season.

 

2 cups >>>> 1 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, PantherChris said:

They will try to run it back watch lol only way they dont is if marner chooses to walk

He probably won’t cause hes from Ontario and I bet they match any offer.

I hope Tulsky steers clear.  We don’t need anymore help in the regular season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, PantherChris said:

I'm sure you will because you are a whiny pessamist of a fan who posts 90% negative.

 

Like when you called the team losers after game 6 of the rags series last year, don't remember your exact posts but you were pretty "Whiny" and "Pessimistic" 

To you "Negative" is anything that allows for the possibility we might lose(like the Homers that had us a lock for the superbowl after we hired Riech) , and if you want better for your team, you will be negative when they lose, doesn't make you less of a fan, makes you more of a fan because you care about there sucess

When I am wrong , I own it, and that's the good thing about hoping for the best, preparing for the worst, if my doubts were unwarranted, then that means we won, and I will come back for seconds of that crow 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, PNW_PantherMan said:

He probably won’t cause hes from Ontario and I bet they match any offer.

I hope Tulsky steers clear.  We don’t need anymore help in the regular season.

Eeeh I dont want him... 

I'd rather have Provorov or Ekblad to replace Burns. If they are insistent on a forward Bennet or Elhers

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...