Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

You’re on the clock


shaq
 Share

Recommended Posts

12 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

Funny thing--we should have enough info to have a very open mind right now, but it sorta works the opposite direction.  With very limited knowledge, some of us are dug in and certain who the pick should be--I am more confused than ever--but that is how i roll.

If they know which teams need/want QBs, my my........ It's looking like dart goes #9. 

This maybe a weird weak draft, but the classic rule is in play. supply demand. There is NOTHING left in the QB market, unless you want to deal with 41 year old psychedelic-knob Arod and his BS. So as bad as the QB draft pool, which I feel is over blown. There's no elite group, but I think around 10-12 will be draft by round 6. Some will become legit starters.

So if ANY team wants/needs a QB, this is your only realistic chance. They will have to pay up.

 

Watch out for Tyler Shough, for the past week Ive seen and hear crazy reports about him. He could go early 2nd round and nearly everyone has him around 4-5 round. He's lava hot, just like nolen. A couple others QBs jumping up for teams. 

The 2-4, *should have surprising action at QB . 

https://www.si.com/nfl/seahawks/seahawks-john-schneider-2025-nfl-draft-quarterback-comments

 

GM Schneider doesn't think its a bad or weak class, just depends on fit, team, and price. But in the interview, he let on on like this QB class has lots of talented options. I agree with him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, MHS831 said:

Trade: 

Indy wants Warren and they fear a few teams before them.  So I found a trade calculator and did this:

image.thumb.png.6b826b15c89c123776748b69ada2b2b7.png

So I get 14, 45, 80.  for 8, 111, 114, and 163. 

Panthers move back to 14, have 2 second rounders (45, 57), and two third rounders (74, 80)-five picks on days 1 and 2.

 

If you can get that do it all day

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Jon Snow said:

He will be the 2nd wr selected after Hunter unless the Panthers take McMillan at 8.

We don’t need another guy like Tet though. We already have Legette. They are the same style of player. 
 

we need a speed, shifty guy like the Dolphins have, or the tandem like the Eagles have. I’d prefer the Chiefs set-up with a Kelci like guy, as that has worked well for them. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He can’t even learn to run routes. No chance in hell he can do both that and pick up blocking schemes 
    • Well he had essentially a 70% completion rate for almost three thousand yards.  Biggest issues were awkward and inconsistent release.  I wouldn't call arm strength bad, but not great.    
    • I see him being better and most of that is a few downfield passes that were seemingly non existent.    But it is what is around him that has dictated the trajectory more than the quarterbacking. He is game manager level and unable to dictate to defenses.  And even if I am wrong and he is the reason we ‘upwarded’, we are bumping our heads on the ceiling and only making meager gains. If it is an incline it is awfully shallow degree wise. Like a finance graph that tracks your progress and hovers around the rate of inflation. Barely breaking even.  Is that where you want your money?  We make up these deadlines expectations and generally he does the minimum of what he needs to do to hang around.    It does not encourage me to believe that when we get into a game against a good run d that we cannot break down with our run game, to believe that we can pivot to the air and successfully counter their strategy.  But they run it back again. Of course I am gunshy of a repeat of the same thing we have watched for three years.    oh, and yes his durability is his most impressive positive for my money. I fear the other shoe dropping on that and the contractual consequences that will follow.   Last  of all, too late to edit my mistake here but would like to acknowledge it: the last three years has done very little to convince me that I was not wrong in not wanting him. One too many “not”s. 
×
×
  • Create New...