Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

PFF grades from last night...Ransom had a night

Captain Morgan

By Captain Morgan,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

kungfoodude Grand Master

kungfoodude

Posted
Posted
18 hours ago, Proudiddy said:

And also, regarding Perkins…. I literally told one of my buddies, his first three throws last night were better than any and every throw Plummer attempted for two whole seasons.  That tells you all you need to know.

If the BY experiment goes off the rails early, I would love to see Perkins get some reps.

You guys are fuging losing your minds with this PS QB love.

Perkins will never be able to run this offense as effectively as Bryce nor Dalton. He is a Jack Plummer level player.

Jake Delhomme really broke people's brains in thia fanbase.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
frankw Grand Master

frankw

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, kungfoodude said:

You guys are fuging losing your minds with this PS QB love.

Perkins will never be able to run this offense as effectively as Bryce nor Dalton. He is a Jack Plummer level player.

Jake Delhomme really broke people's brains in thia fanbase.

He's marginally better than Plummer but that's a subterranean low bar. I think most people know Perkins is a jag at best. But it's through no fault of ours we find ourselves in this situation. The responsibility rests with Dan Morgan.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
kungfoodude Grand Master

kungfoodude

Posted
Posted
14 minutes ago, frankw said:

He's marginally better than Plummer but that's a subterranean low bar. I think most people know Perkins is a jag at best. But it's through no fault of ours we find ourselves in this situation. The responsibility rests with Dan Morgan.

We don't need a 3rd QB, TBH. Bryce is either gonna be bad or fine and Dalton is a top tier #2(will win you a couple perhaps). 

If we aren't shooting for the moon on a mid-to late round draft pick, the PS QB is fuging very irrelevant.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
frankw Grand Master

frankw

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

We don't need a 3rd QB, TBH. Bryce is either gonna be bad or fine and Dalton is a top tier #2(will win you a couple perhaps). 

If we aren't shooting for the moon on a mid-to late round draft pick, the PS QB is fuging very irrelevant.

Best case scenario this season is Bryce either looks like a top 12 QB or he is awful again.

For me. Either way. They need to draft a developmental QB next year even if Bryce emerges. We can't keep treating the QB room like this.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
kungfoodude Grand Master

kungfoodude

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, frankw said:

Best case scenario this season is Bryce either looks like a top 12 QB or he is awful again.

For me. Either way. They need to draft a developmental QB next year even if Bryce emerges. We can't keep treating the QB room like this.

We have always treated the QB room like this. I mean literally forever.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
frankw Grand Master

frankw

Posted
Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

We have always treated the QB room like this. I mean literally forever.

Well you would think the people in the front office and on staff would consider that and a light bulb would go off. But. They were hired by the Tepper's after all.🤷‍♂️

Edited by frankw
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
gakonline Community Regular

gakonline

Posted
Posted
31 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

You guys are fuging losing your minds with this PS QB love.

Perkins will never be able to run this offense as effectively as Bryce nor Dalton. He is a Jack Plummer level player.

Jake Delhomme really broke people's brains in thia fanbase.

I don’t think anyone thinks Perkins can  play with the first unit and succeed.  Everyone pointing out the fact he looks better than Plummer with only two practices. 
 

I was really pulling for Plummer to figure it out and take Dalton’s spot at QB2. Oh well, there was a reason they brought in Perkins. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
kungfoodude Grand Master

kungfoodude

Posted
Posted
6 hours ago, gakonline said:

I don’t think anyone thinks Perkins can  play with the first unit and succeed.  Everyone pointing out the fact he looks better than Plummer with only two practices. 
 

I was really pulling for Plummer to figure it out and take Dalton’s spot at QB2. Oh well, there was a reason they brought in Perkins. 

He can't take Dalton's spot. Dalton was a Pro Bowl QB, Perkins will never be more than a 3rd string/PS QB.

This is the disconnect I am talking about. IDK what is wrong with our fans.

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • strato
      That's it. How do you feel about this draft class.

      By strato · Posted

      I was watching a YouTube and it was said that scout and GM insider types were saying the NIL had killed rounds 4-7. I don’t know that I buy it, seems like it might for a year or maybe two but then those guys have to move on.  NCAA is apparently about to give 5 years of eligibility. It is gonna skew those entrants older maybe.   
    • ForJimmy
      Panthers attempted to trade up with Ravens?

      By ForJimmy · Posted

      Miller being less raw and more pro ready makes sense of why they picked him. With us having a capable starter in Walker the lower floor higher ceiling player makes sense for us as well. I agree with that. 
    • tukafan21
      Panthers attempted to trade up with Ravens?

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      I'm from Michigan and have had this discussion with my Lions friends, and they all agree with me, they were never going to take Freeling over Miller.  As, yes, you are correct, they could have left Sewell at RT and taken Freeling, but they are in a SB contention window right now. An OL with Freeling at LT and Sewell at RT is not as strong as Sewell at LT and Miller at RT would be for this upcoming season and likely at least next year as well. 5 years it could be looked back upon as a long term "mistake" to take Miller over Freeling, but for a franchise like the Lions, you can't worry about the long term when you have current SB aspirations.  It's all about maximizing their current SB window over the next 1-3 years. And it's not about style, it's about day 1 readiness, and a lot of "experts" aren't even sure if Freeling is ready to play Week 1 yet at the position he's used to, let alone switching to a side he hasn't played before, but a career starting RT is going to be more than ready to fill that role for them Week 1. I'm 100% convinced that if our draft positioning was swapped, we'd have still taken Freeling, they'd have still taken Miller, and both teams would have got the OT that they preferred due to what each team needs right now and what their current realistic aspirations are for the 2026 season. We're in a position where we can let our drafted OT sit and learn for a bit, they needed a week 1 starter, for me that's where this discussion becomes very easy to understand why each team took the player they did.
×
×
  • Create New...