Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

MNF-Vikings vs Bears

Jackie Lee

By Jackie Lee,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, PantherChris said:

Dude isnt looking great but nah that was 100% PI you have to play the ball he didnt look at all

By the rule it was, but they need to change that. The pass interference calls on horribly underthrown deep balls need to stop. Fighting back through a DB in better position to get to a ball uncatchable should not be rewarded with a flag. It's crap.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
PantherChris Grand Master

PantherChris

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

By the rule it was, but they need to change that. The pass interference calls on horribly underthrown deep balls need to stop. Fighting back through a DB in better position to get to a ball uncatchable should not be rewarded with a flag. It's crap.

All the DB has to do is LOOK for the ball and no PI.... you see a guy looking you whip your head around this is middle school stuff man. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, PantherChris said:

All the DB has to do is LOOK for the ball and no PI.... you see a guy looking you whip your head around this is middle school stuff man. 

 

 

Or just change the wording of the rule. A DB should not have to look for the ball to have a right to his position. They just need to clean up the verbiage.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
PNW_PantherMan Grand Master

PNW_PantherMan

Posted
Posted
Just now, LinvilleGorge said:

Or just change the wording of the rule. A DB should not have to look for the ball to have a right to his position. They just need to clean up the verbiage.

Yea you can’t touch anyone now.  You should at a minimum have a right to the space you’re in.  But that’s why I don’t understand the value on premium CBs.  The rules are a joke.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

Yea you can’t touch anyone now.  You should at a minimum have a right to the space you’re in.  But that’s why I don’t understand the value on premium CBs.  The rules are a joke.

If a DB tries to run through a receiver to get a ball it's pass interference every time. If a receiver tries to run through a DB to get a ball, it's still pass interference on the DB. That's clown world stuff.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • KillerKat
      New site coming sooner than planned??

      By KillerKat · Posted

      That new home page looking sexy and thicc
    • The Third Reich
      Ikem

      By The Third Reich · Posted

      Serious question:  Why LG and not RG?  There may be something I do not know, but Hunt's contract is huge and he could be let go after this season (post june 1 cut) and it would save the Panthers a ton of money.  Extending him would be paying a G who is in his mid 30s guaranteed money (and I do not see that as a terrible thing).  So if we release him at age 31, we save $19m.  I like him, but at 31, will he be worth the mega contract?   LG Damien Lewis has actually outperformed Hunt and he is a year younger.  He would also save less vs. the cap and leave less in the dead cap pool.  While his current contract expires after the 2027 season, he is a better prospect (IMO) to extend because only 50% of his current contract was guaranteed.  Here are his contract numbers.   Now, getting to Ickey--he could want LT money if he is offered a second contract.  If we pay him LT money to play either G positions, we are likely overpaying.  Secondly, the injury he suffered could be one that limits his productivity.  Ickey was improving, but he was an average LT.  The only way I re-sign Ickey is to have him accept a G contract and make a lot of it incentive based.     I feel like I am missing something, but in my mind, Ickey was always a guard if you consider the fact that he is an average OT and would be a great G.  Is that still the case (injury)?
    • UnluckyforSome
      Sorsby to the supplemental draft

      By UnluckyforSome · Posted

      Supplemental draft uses picks from next year. So a team were to draft him in the 1st, their upcoming 1st next draft would no longer be available. There have been some notable players that were obtained in the supplemental draft, such as Kosar. It doesn't necessarily happen every year either, and is more on a as needed basis. The gambling trouble is a big red flag for teams, and maybe pushes him down to a 4th? Not sure a team would use a 1st on him.
×
×
  • Create New...