Highest rate of incompletions due to WR error

[Jon Snow]

36 minutes ago, CRA said:

3rd straight openers of horrific football featuring Bryce.  

and if the games weren't dated....I bet someone unfamiliar with Bryce/us  couldn't figure out which one was his rookie season just off the 3 openers. 

I never needed stats to tell me how a player is doing. I watch every snap and if they have more bad plays than good plays that is all I need to see. Young has more bad than he has good, by a wide margin. 

He was going to need to overcome an overwhelming size disadvantage coming into the league. He had to lead a dysfunctional, talentless team and turn it around. He had no chance and somehow the FO overlooked all of that.

The fact that the odds of it being remotely successful were 1000:1 is all the reason you need.

Tepper made his fortune taking gambles like this but that is in finance, you don't do that in football. 

[CRA]

50 minutes ago, PantherChris said:

Ehhh XL was horrible, this metric I feel like only tells part of the story not all catches missed due to receiver error are equal, down and distance, and yardage/potential scored missed matter too.

Feels about right.  Syncs up.  XL being horrible doesn’t give him a multiplier.  

On WRs

- no foot down

- 4th and 1

- you pick  

on Bryce 

-opening over throw 

- under throw to Renfrow 

-pushed out of bounds to Renfrow 

- hospital ball to Renfrow 

- underthrow to TMac 

- INT to the S

On nobody 

- Saunders 50/50

- TMac in the endzone 

That’s 11 of them.  Not sure what I would do with the Dowdle ball. Can’t remember the others off the top

[CRA]

57 minutes ago, Panthering said:

This isn't directed at CRA or anyone in particular, but as someone who works with large datasets every day, it's funny how you can construe data to fit any particular narrative. 

I mean this is just a hilarious tweet, a stat nobody has ever heard of, then some percentages with QB name. No numerator/denominator to provide context, no explanation of the formula, just another stathead loser with a mustache parroting whatever he wants. 

So much of this stuff is worthless, especially in a sport like Football. 

Well I 100% agree you deep dive for any player and create almost any narrative/argument. 

Thats why at the end of the day, your take when the clock strikes zero is largely the most solid IMO.   Was TMac good? Yes.  Was XL bad? Yes.  

The I need to watch the tape first mentality and check out the analytics sites to form an opinion…..gets real squirrely.