Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Why is Canalas so pass happy?


Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, strato said:

I don’t think that’s true about us being the only team. Lots of teams with top WRs have had successful number twos because of all the attention the one draws. 

Well sure, but that's not at all what I was saying, I wasn't saying we're the only team that ever uses their #1 as a decoy.

My point was that I can't remember a team where there is such a talent gap between their top WR and the rest of their WR room, and then said top WR is used more often as a decoy than as an actual pass catching target, particularly in their rookie season such as Nabers last year and then the nothingness behind him in their WR room.

Because I don't think anyone can objectively look at the play design and calls so far and say he's been running more routes with the intention of being a target than with the intention of clearing out space for Bryce to dump it off to someone else closer to the LOS.

The other difference is when teams allow their #1 WR to be used as a decoy because teams are constantly double teaming them.  Then they generally make sure to target them when they get left on an island in single coverage, something we routinely fail to do when T-Mac gets that coverage.

Edited by tukafan21
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, tukafan21 said:

Well sure, but that's not at all what I was saying, I wasn't saying we're the only team that ever uses their #1 as a decoy.

My point was that I can't remember a team where there is such a talent gap between their top WR and the rest of their WR room, and then said top WR is used more often as a decoy than as an actual pass catching target.

Because I don't think anyone can objectively look at the play design and calls so far and say he's been running more routes with the intention of being a target than with the intention of clearing out space for Bryce to dump it off to someone else closer to the LOS.

The other difference is when teams allow their #1 WR to be used as a decoy because teams are constantly double teaming them.  Then they generally make sure to target them when they get left on an island in single coverage, something we routinely fail to do when T-Mac gets that coverage.

He needs a QB. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, strato said:

He needs a QB. 

Yes, but those are two separate issues.

Using your best player more often as a decoy than a true target, just because your QB sucks, is just dumb and compounding your issues as then your bad QB is throwing the ball to inferior pass catchers on a more frequent basis.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, tukafan21 said:

Yes, but those are two separate issues.

Using your best player more often as a decoy than a true target, just because your QB sucks, is just dumb and compounding your issues as then your bad QB is throwing the ball to inferior pass catchers on a more frequent basis.

I am not gonna get exhausted obsessing over semantics, parsing what a decoy is and all that - obviously your fanning is T Mac centric. I should have kept my big mouth shut. Peace. 

Edited by strato
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...