Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Goalie play sucks


Panthers Fan 69
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Anybodyhome said:

Kochetkov is 3-0 with a shutout and a GAA under 2.

Bussi is 4-1.

Freddie is 5-4-1.

Tell me who isn't playing well, again?

Records are misleading.  Watch the games. Koochie has the last good goalie game vs the rags.  Goalie play after has been poo with mixes of good. So many 6 shots 2 goals lately. 

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

5 hours ago, Anybodyhome said:

Kochetkov is 3-0 with a shutout and a GAA under 2.

Bussi is 4-1.

Freddie is 5-4-1.

Tell me who isn't playing well, again?

Sure if you look at surface stats and don't take into account level of competition....

 

Big difference between this year's rags and the frigging oilers, and the number of high dangers given up....

 

.1 % difference in save percentage...   the problem is the defense no one is gonna look great consistently and vs elite competition without Slavin and Chatfield on the ice.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Panthers Fan 69 said:

Records are misleading.  Watch the games. Koochie has the last good goalie game vs the rags.  Goalie play after has been poo with mixes of good. So many 6 shots 2 goals lately. 

And there is a huge difference between this year's rags and the frigging two time western conference champion oilers 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Anybodyhome said:

Oh, that part of the equation is easy. Since the injuries began stacking up, the Canes are beating bad teams, having dogfights against average teams and losing to good teams.

Eeh they have squeaked a win or two out vs good squads.... 

But tbh given who (Slavin) and the fact that its hit all the same postion..... its still quite impressive, I'm in fact not worried at all its not about the regular season....  canes are a much much different team with Slavin and Chatty on the and by trickle down having the rest of the d were they should be.  

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, PantherChris said:

Eeh they have squeaked a win or two out vs good squads.... 

But tbh given who (Slavin) and the fact that its hit all the same postion..... its still quite impressive, I'm in fact not worried at all its not about the regular season....  canes are a much much different team with Slavin and Chatty on the and by trickle down having the rest of the d were they should be.  

Completely agree. They have, in my opinion, played exceptionally well considering the routine shuttle flights between Raleigh & Chicago with players in the starting lineup the very night they arrive... lol.

  • Pie 2
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Anybodyhome said:

Completely agree. They have, in my opinion, played exceptionally well considering the routine shuttle flights between Raleigh & Chicago with players in the starting lineup the very night they arrive... lol.

Yep I don't think ive ever seen us with a rash of injuries to one position group this bad.. .

 

Literally Nikishin is the only one who hasn't missed time *knock on wood* every other d man is either currently out or has missed at least half the games so far...  heck the dudes are the back ups back up.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, PantherChris said:

Eeh they have squeaked a win or two out vs good squads.... 

But tbh given who (Slavin) and the fact that its hit all the same postion..... its still quite impressive, I'm in fact not worried at all its not about the regular season....  canes are a much much different team with Slavin and Chatty on the and by trickle down having the rest of the d were they should be.  

image.thumb.png.0ec88b7ea7bf9a0b7bb9ee8fcfeefa2f.pngThey have beat 5 of the top 7 teams so far. They have some damn good wins. Plus the leafs. Which will be better.  Canes ARE beating good teams. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Miller being less raw and more pro ready makes sense of why they picked him. With us having a capable starter in Walker the lower floor higher ceiling player makes sense for us as well. I agree with that. 
    • I'm from Michigan and have had this discussion with my Lions friends, and they all agree with me, they were never going to take Freeling over Miller.  As, yes, you are correct, they could have left Sewell at RT and taken Freeling, but they are in a SB contention window right now. An OL with Freeling at LT and Sewell at RT is not as strong as Sewell at LT and Miller at RT would be for this upcoming season and likely at least next year as well. 5 years it could be looked back upon as a long term "mistake" to take Miller over Freeling, but for a franchise like the Lions, you can't worry about the long term when you have current SB aspirations.  It's all about maximizing their current SB window over the next 1-3 years. And it's not about style, it's about day 1 readiness, and a lot of "experts" aren't even sure if Freeling is ready to play Week 1 yet at the position he's used to, let alone switching to a side he hasn't played before, but a career starting RT is going to be more than ready to fill that role for them Week 1. I'm 100% convinced that if our draft positioning was swapped, we'd have still taken Freeling, they'd have still taken Miller, and both teams would have got the OT that they preferred due to what each team needs right now and what their current realistic aspirations are for the 2026 season. We're in a position where we can let our drafted OT sit and learn for a bit, they needed a week 1 starter, for me that's where this discussion becomes very easy to understand why each team took the player they did.
×
×
  • Create New...