-
Welcome!
Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!
Or simply create a new Huddle account.
Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!
-
-
-
-
Topics
-
-
-
-
Posts
-
Interesting comment, because i think they expected Sanders to become that big play WR-type. But we have drafted a lot of TEs, but we have yet to make a significance investment in a playmaking TE. I can say that we have been using some 3 TE sets and Evans and Tremble looked solid as blockers. Unfortunately, this draft only has one or two who would upgrade our group. In fact, I might suggest that only Oregon's Sadiq fills that prescription. I think we could add a free agent. I expect this would give Bryce another option since he checks down so much--a mid-range target. I think Sadiq could improve the offense more than a first round WR. ''''''' This article also suggests that the Panthers are OK with the Edge situation. That implies that Scourton and Princely are expected to step up in 2026. -
By kungfoodude · Posted
Evans might be something at some point, Sanders and Tremble are replacement level players. Eventually you want to get an actual game changing TE at some point. -
Yeah...no. he's actually just engaging in the same "should / will" confusion as others have by taking Person out of context. Here's the rest of Person's statement: Canales, Dan Morgan and Tilis will weigh more than just the next four games, even if Young plays well and the Panthers end their seven-year playoff drought, when considering an extension. Young and the Panthers have taken another step forward this season. If that ascension continues in 2026, his payday is coming. Notice the "if" statements... Joe is talking about an extension being the next decision on the horizon and what will ultimately determine their choice of action. And all that within the context of what top quarterbacks are getting paid right now. In not way is he arguing that kind of extension should be considered right now. Hell, Person set the contezt for this elaboration just one sentence back in the start of the paragraph. He calls the fifth year option "an easy decision" specifically because it's more economical than any proposed extension might be. So no, it's not a solid answer. On the contrary, it's just another example of the same mistake.
-
-
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.